by Moe | Apr 23, 2023 | Mind Control Research, Neoliberalism, Philosophy, Traditionalism
Peter Thiel, founder of PayPal and Palantir, and the first outside investor in Facebook, has been on a speaking tour discussing theological themes such as the Antichrist and the Apocalypse in relation to scientific and technological progress.
Thiel’s concern is the lack of progress, and he brought that concern to the world’s oldest and most prestigious debating society, The Oxford Union, as the inaugural speaker of the Union’s bicentennial year.
His speech was a full-throated defense of classical liberalism within the context of Christian apocalypticism.
He opened the speech with the question, “What is the antonym of diversity?” Answer: “University.”
That is the challenge of our age, whether institutions such as universities will carry on as zombie-like enforcers of ideological justifications for stagnation or whether they will rediscover their role as vibrant centers for debate, the purpose for which the Oxford Union was created.
Thiel believes globalization is the Antichrist, the Antichrist is the antecedent to the Apocalypse foretold in the Book of Revelations and only a turn toward Jesus Christ can save humanity from annihilation.
That the technology of moving atoms is so stagnant that the word “tech” is now typically used to refer to information technology. Apart from the world of bits, technological progress has been stagnant.
Scientific debate is suppressed, and topics such as Darwinism and climate science are off limits. Our industrial economy is destroying the earth, and artificial intelligence will rise up and kill or enslave us.
Thiel argues that we need to reclaim the Christian philosophical and religious traditions in the West or face destruction. The eclipse of Shakespeare by revolutionary literature such as I, Rigoberta Menchu, demonstrates a crisis within the humanities and a crisis of classical liberalism.
According to Thiel, government suppression makes real progress impossible, and the corrupt grantmaking system and academic politics churn out endless (often unverifiable) journal articles but no flying cars or cold fusion.
The mounting intensity of his political spending traces his evolution from an economic and social libertarian to a “Dark Enlightenment” and Christian-nationalist authoritarian.
In 2004, Thiel organized a conference at Stanford University to honor his mentor, philosopher and political anthropologist René Girard. The paper he wrote for that conference, “The Straussian Moment,” was a metaphysical effort to assign meaning to 9/11 and its aftermath.
The quandary we face in the 21st century post-9/11, Thiel writes, begins with the death of God in the West.
Having lost any commitment to the Christian philosophical and religious traditions that once prevailed, we no longer question ourselves in the right way — if we question ourselves at all.
The argument starts with the political correctness debates of university life in the ’90s and the controversies at Stanford University about Western civilization, both the course and the historical reality the course purports to study. Thiel argues that we need to reclaim those traditions in the West or face destruction.
The eclipse of Shakespeare by revolutionary literature such as I, Rigoberta Menchu, demonstrates a crisis within the humanities and a crisis of classical liberalism. The rebuttal to that was that the humanities don’t matter. What matters, we are told, is science.
The achievements of the Manhattan Project and similar government-led triumphs were seen as leaving behind the old world of humanities and debates over whether to read or cancel dead white European males.
Thiel argues that scientism is the rebuttal to classical liberalism. But is there a rebuttal to this rebuttal? Science isn’t really progressing as it was in the past. The Manhattan Project is long gone.
Scientific debate is suppressed, and topics such as Darwinism and climate science are off-limits. Apart from the world of bits, technological progress has been stagnant. The technology of moving atoms is so stagnant that the word “tech” is now typically used to refer to information technology.
Thiel believes that any system that demands enough power to fulfill the promise of peace and safety is far more of a threat than anything it promises to protect you from. The tech sector is computers, not fusion, not hypersonic air travel because computers are the only tech with much of anything happening.
According to Thiel, government suppression makes real progress impossible. The corrupt grant-making system and academic politics churn out endless (often unverifiable) journal articles but no flying cars or cold fusion.
While significant on its own terms, the mounting intensity of Thiel’s political spending traces his evolution from an economic and social libertarian to a “Dark Enlightenment” and Christian-nationalist authoritarian. (As a reactionary philosophical and political movement, the Dark Enlightenment is anti-democratic and anti-egalitarian.)
Thiel’s argument starts with the political correctness debates of university life in the ’90s and the controversies at Stanford University about Western civilization.
His speeches on deeply theological themes, which combine classical liberalism with Christian apocalypticism, offer a new perspective on the relationship between science, technology, and religion.
Thiel donated tens of millions of dollars to political candidates and causes in US elections, and in the 2022 midterm elections alone, he donated around $32.5 million to the Senate campaigns and political action committees of far-right conservatives J.D. Vance in Ohio and Blake Masters in Arizona.
While controversial, his ideas have sparked important debates about the role of universities and the humanities, the impact of government suppression on scientific progress, and the need to reclaim the Christian philosophical and religious traditions in the West.
Thiel’s views are likely to continue to be discussed and debated in the years to come, as the world grapples with the challenges of globalization, technological progress, and the existential threats facing humanity.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Apr 22, 2023 | Neoliberalism, Philosophy, Traditionalism
The Dark Enlightenment is a loosely defined intellectual movement that emerged in the early 21st century. It seeks to challenge the assumptions of the liberal democratic tradition that emerged after the Enlightenment period.
While there is no single, unified Dark Enlightenment theory, its adherents share a broad set of concerns about the current state of society.
They seek to develop alternative models for governance, culture, and social organization.
Its core philosophy can be traced back to two prominent philosophers of the 19th and 20th centuries, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. Both Nietzsche and Heidegger had critiqued the Enlightenment’s emphasis on rationality and the individual, but their philosophies were from different ideological perspectives.
Nietzsche was more of a liberal, individualist, progressive, and anti-traditionalist, while Heidegger advocated for Traditionalism but with more of a modernist approach.
Nietzsche argued that traditional values, particularly those propagated by organized religion and societal norms, hindered the individual’s development of their own unique potential, leading to conformity and suppression of individuality.
He saw traditionalism as a form of herd mentality that stifled creativity, vitality, and self-realization.
Nietzsche famously declared that “God is dead” and criticized traditional religious beliefs as outdated and detrimental to human flourishing.
On the other hand, Martin Heidegger, a prominent figure in existentialist and phenomenological philosophy, had emphasized the importance of tradition in shaping human existence and thought.
He saw tradition as an essential aspect of human existence, as it provided a sense of belonging, continuity, and rootedness.
He argued that tradition is understood as the shared history, language, and culture of a community, providing the framework for human existence and giving meaning to human life.
However, Heidegger also warned against the dangers of blindly adhering to tradition without critical reflection, as he believed that tradition could also become stagnant and prevent individuals from engaging authentically with their own existence.
He can be called a Progressive Traditionist who believed that respecting the autonomy of the individual to learn, grow and live in the modern world, rather than blindly following old traditions.
While both Nietzsche nor Heidegger never coined the term, the Dark Enlightenment, their ideas gained momentum in the 21st century as its core philosophers, with the rise of the internet and the proliferation of online communities.
One of the key figures in the modern development of the Dark Enlightenment in our day is Curtis Yarvin, who wrote under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug.
Yarvin’s blog, “Unqualified Reservations,” became a hub for the movement, and he developed a following among tech elites in Silicon Valley.
His writings rejected democracy and called for a return to monarchy and aristocracy. He argued that democracy was inherently flawed because it placed power in the hands of the ignorant masses, who were susceptible to demagogues and populists.
Instead, he advocated for a system in which power was concentrated in the hands of a small elite, who were best equipped to make decisions for the good of society as a whole.
The movement is often associated with the alt-right, a far-right movement that emerged in the United States in the 2010s.
However, not all members consider themselves part of the alt-right, and the two movements have some differences in their ideologies.
At the heart of the Dark Enlightenment is a rejection of the liberal democratic tradition.
This is seen as having failed to provide a stable and sustainable governance model.
Adherents of the movement argue that democracy is inherently flawed because it places power in the hands of the ignorant masses, who are easily swayed by populist demagogues.
They argue that democracy leads to a “tyranny of the majority,” in which the interests of the minority are ignored in favor of the majority.
According to its core ethos, the liberal democratic tradition is characterized by a naive faith in progress, individualism, and equality.
These beliefs have resulted in social decay, cultural decline, and the erosion of Western civilization.
Instead, adherents of the Dark Enlightenment advocate for a system in which power is concentrated in the hands of a small elite, who are best equipped to make decisions for the good of society as a whole.
They also believe that this decay is the result of a number of factors. These factors include the breakdown of traditional values, the rise of secularism, the decline of religion, and the corruption of the political system.
They argue that this system would be more efficient and effective than democracy, as decisions would be made by those with the most knowledge and expertise.
To counteract these trends, Dark Enlightenment adherents advocate for a return to traditional forms of governance, cultural values, and social organization.
This includes a rejection of modern liberal democracy’s egalitarianism, which is considered unrealistic and undesirable.
Instead, the Dark Enlightenment promotes a hierarchy based on natural differences in ability and intelligence.
This hierarchy should guide decision-making in all areas of life, from politics to culture to personal relationships.
They argue that society is naturally hierarchical and that attempts to create a society based on equality are doomed to fail.
They believe that hierarchy is necessary for social order and stability, and that attempts to eliminate it will only lead to chaos and disorder.
It also emphasizes the importance of cultural and ethnic identities, which are seen as essential for maintaining social cohesion and a sense of purpose. This means that the movement is often associated with nationalism and ethnic chauvinism.
Some of its adherents have been accused of racism and xenophobia. However, many Dark Enlightenment thinkers reject these labels.
They argue that their ideas are based on a realistic assessment of the importance of cultural and ethnic identity in maintaining social order and stability.
Another key figure in the Dark Enlightenment is Nick Land, a former philosophy professor at the University of Warwick.
He began his career as a left-wing thinker and was associated with the “cybernetic culture research unit” at the University of Warwick, which explored the intersection of technology and culture.
Land has argued that democracy is a failed experiment that has led to the decay of Western civilization. It has also led to the rise of a parasitic class of elites who manipulate the masses for their own benefit.
He has said;
“The basic theme has been mind control, or thought-suppression, as demonstrated by the Media-Academic complex that dominates contemporary Western societies, and which Mencius Moldbug names the Cathedral.
When things are squashed they rarely disappear. Instead, they are displaced, fleeing into sheltering shadows, and sometimes turning into monsters.
Today, as the suppressive orthodoxy of the Cathedral comes unstrung, in various ways, and numerous senses, a time of monsters is approaching.”
Democracy is what prevents the realization of freedom, writes Land, suggesting that democracy is merely an Enlightenment myth:
“In European classical antiquity, democracy was recognized as a familiar phase of cyclical political development, fundamentally decadent in nature, and preliminary to a slide into tyranny,” Land says.
“Today this classical understanding is thoroughly lost, and replaced by a global democratic ideology, entirely lacking in critical self-reflection.
This ideology is asserted not as a credible social-scientific thesis, or even as a spontaneous popular aspiration, but rather as a religious creed, of a specific, historically identifiable kind,” Land had written.
His work is characterized by a rejection of traditional morality and a fascination with technology and artificial intelligence. Land believes that technological progress and social change should be accelerated rather than slowed down.
He argues that the only way to escape modern society’s constraints is to embrace the chaos of technological innovation and abandon the traditional values of liberalism and democracy.
Land says that humanity is rapidly approaching a point of technological singularity, at which point the distinction between humans and machines will become blurred.
In this new world, traditional morality will be replaced by a new form of ethics, based on the optimization of intelligence and the pursuit of power.
In addition to Moldbug and Land, there are a number of other thinkers associated with the Dark Enlightenment.
These include the man dubbed the world’s most dangerous philosopher, Alexandr Dugin, economist Tyler Cowen, the philosopher Peter Thiel, and the journalist John Derbyshire.
Dugin’s version of the Dark Enlightenment is heavily influenced by the ideas of Heidegger and the French thinker Julius Evola. He sees modernity as a crisis of meaning and identity, and argues that the only way to overcome this crisis is to return to Traditionalism.
He has argued that the Enlightenment project has been a failure. We need a new paradigm that is based on a rejection of individualism and an embrace of collective identity.
Despite the controversy surrounding his ideas, Dugin has become a prominent figure in Russian intellectual circles and has been influential in shaping political discourse in not only Russia, but also in the U.S. and around the globe. His philosophies have also gained traction among far-right and alt-right groups who see him as a kindred spirit in their quest to upend the liberal democratic order.
Peter Thiel, founder of PayPal and Palantir, and the first outside investor in Facebook, has been speaking about the Dark Enlightenment for years and on recent college tours discussing apocalyptic themes such as the Antichrist and the Apocalypse
Thiel’s views on the Dark Enlightenment and his association with its proponents have sparked controversy and criticism.
Some have accused him of promoting authoritarianism and fascism, while others have praised him for his willingness to challenge mainstream political and social norms.
In a 2009 essay for the Cato Institute, Thiel criticized democracy and argued that it had failed to deliver meaningful progress. He also expressed skepticism about the ability of individuals to make rational decisions and suggested that authoritarianism might be a better alternative.
In a 2013 interview with the National Review, Thiel expressed his admiration for Moldbug’s ideas and described him as “the most interesting thinker” in the tech industry. He has also been critical of Silicon Valley culture and has argued that it is too focused on individualism and not enough on the common good.
He suggested that the tech industry needs to be more willing to work with the government and embrace a more collaborative approach to solving problems.
However, the movement is characterized more by a shared set of concerns than by a unified intellectual program, and there is a great deal of debate and disagreement among its adherents.
Critics of the Dark Enlightenment argue that its ideas are fundamentally reactionary and represent a retreat from the advances of modernity.
They point out that the movement’s emphasis on hierarchy, tradition, and ethnic identity is reminiscent of the ideologies that gave rise to the most brutal atrocities in the past.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Feb 18, 2023 | Mind Control Research, Philosophy, Traditionalism
“For a man to conquer himself is the first and noblest of all victories.” – Plato
The Ancient Greeks divided the soul of a person into three different parts – the mind (nous), the spirit (thumos), and needs or desires (epithumia).
Humans could be considered the charitor in the middle.
These parts would have different biological and mental operating functions that could either work with one another to help a person live a good and healthy life or they could work against each other to cause a person to have a bad and unhealthy life.
As if each part had a mind of its own.
In order to make rational and good decisions, each of the three parts must work with one another in a balanced manner.
In Plato’s Republic, speaking through Socrates, he divides the soul into three sections: the rational (nous), spirited (thumos), and desiring (epithumia or appetites).
Plato further elaborates on his own tripartite theory of the soul as the following:
Nous – is related to the “mind or intellect and “reason”, which involves thoughts, reflections, and questioning and should be the controlling part of the soul that subjugates the appetites with the help of our thumos.
Thumos (Thymos) – is related to our spirit and the modern concept of the ego, emotions, and passions of which we feel sadness, anger, fear, courage, glory, love, etc. (the Republic IV, 439e);
Epithumia – is our desires or appetites, which is normally ascribed to our lower natures or bodily desires such as food, drink, sex, money, power, etc.
For Plato, when these three parts of the soul are balanced and work in combination with one another, this makes us better suited in our destined vocation, and is also the secret process for developing our innate ideas.
It is interesting how Plato’s description of the so-called “spirited element” ( to thumoeides or thumos) helps or works against the intellect (nous), but also in either subjugating or being subject to our appetites.
This is why Plato once said, “For a man to conquer himself is the first and noblest of all victories.”
And his student Aristotle followed with, “What lies in our power to do, lies in our power not to do.”
Plato believed that the thumos (spirit) was the source for desires, emotions, and sensitivities. And also various attributes such as bravery, determination, and nobility that also needed to be tempered by a need for civility, order, and justice.
Within the ideal city state, every citizen would possess a healthy thumos (spirit) within their souls.
This thumos (spirit) would allow citizens to uphold their honor and courageously assert their opinion within civic life. A citizen also knows how to maintain composure or restrict the thumos (spirit) if it were to passionate, violent or when it were misdirected.
When discussing his ideal state within the pages of The Republic, Plato, through the voice of Socrates, explains that the ideal guard or soldier would be possessed with a spirited sense of thumos and a desire to combat injustice.
Plato mentions thumos when commenting on a dog that is both loyal to his master, and dangerous to any evil-doer he may encounter.
“And is he likely to be brave who has no spirit, whether horse or dog or any other animal? Have you never observed how invincible and unconquerable is a spirit and how the presence of it makes the soul of any creature to be absolutely fearless and indomitable?”- Plato (Republic Book II)
In the dialog Phaedrus, Plato compares the human soul to a chariot that is being pulled by one white horse and one black horse, with a skilled charioteer at the reigns.
“First the charioteer of the human soul drives a pair, and secondly one of the horses is noble and of noble breed, but the other quite the opposite in breed and character. Therefore in our case the driving is necessarily difficult and troublesome.”-Plato (Phaedrus)
The black horse is said to represent men’s passions and appetites (epithumia).
The white horse is said to represent what in Greek is called thumos, which again, means the spirit or ego. And the charioteer is what Plato calls the noble breed or soul using the power of reason, which holds the reigns of both horses steadily through reason, while not allowing either to run wild.
This is a powerful image by Plato to describe how to balance these different parts (minds) of the soul in order to lead a balanced and healthy life.
One horse represents our day to day needs and desires or what could be called our animal instincts, and the other represents our divine instinct to pursue social pride or what we call nobility.
In Homer’s works, thumos is used to describe the internal psychological process of thought, emotion, volition, and motivation. It was the emotional state of man, to which his thinking and feeling belonged.
It is what motivates us to accomplish or will or what can be called our God given destinies.
When a Homer writes about a hero who is under duress, he will project his thumos to converse with or get angry with it as if he has two minds or personalities to contend with within himself.
Homer uses thumos to describe the way in which a hero thinks and what drives his passions and motivations.
A “thomeward” man has an inner strength that may be called upon when faced with certain death, but it also remains separate from him and drives its own course regardless of what may be going on externally to the person.
Therefore, we can say that the thumos is the most crucial component for any hero or nobility.
Homer represents Achilles as the only hero who speaks and questions his soul as “his great-hearted spirit” when he is unsure of how to proceed in battle. He uses thumos to show how Achilles is able to use logic and reason as he thinks out loud to himself, and arrives at important decisions.
The power or energy of the thumos could help a hero control his body and also be brave because it was a power or energy that was bigger than himself. It was something the hero initiated and tapped into, but it was also an agency that was separate from him.
The thumos not only can help a hero to be brave and stand their ground, but also acts as a metaphysical bond that ties him together with other heroes i.e., nobility who have similar thumos or spirits.
Thus creating invisible chains (Noosphere) that connect people to one another to assist not only in combat, but also in helping protect all that is good in society.
Cowards or weak people who do not have a strong thumos do not have the ability or God given right to tap into this energy or power.
As if by default, they are cut off from the source or God.
The Ancient Greek pre-Socratic philosopher, Democritus used “euthymia” (i.e. “good thumos”) to refer to when our soul is calm and steadfast. Not being disturbed by fear, superstition, or passions.
Meaning that a person can have a bad thumos or a good one.
For Democritus, having euthymia was one of the main goals of human life.
Diogenes Laërtius had wrote about Democritus’ view as follows:
“The chief good he asserts to be cheerfulness (euthymia); which, however, he does not consider the same as pleasure; as some people, who have misunderstood him, have fancied that he meant; but he understands by cheerfulness, a condition according to which the soul lives calmly and steadily, being disturbed by no fear, or superstition, or other passion.”
In Seneca’s essay on tranquility, he defines euthymia as “believing in yourself and trusting that you are on the right path, and not being in doubt by following the myriad footpaths of those wandering in every direction.”
SOURCES:
Psychological Ideas in Antiquity. In: Dictionary of the History of Ideas. 1973-74 Long, A. A.
The Oxford Classical Dictionary (Douglass Cairns)
Homer (2003). The Iliad (Wordsworth Classics) (New ed.)
The Daily Stoic: 366 Meditations on Wisdom, Perseverance, and the Art of Living: Featuring new translations of Seneca, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Dec 26, 2022 | Neoliberalism, Philosophy, Political Metaphysics, Satanism, Traditionalism
“You offspring of snakes! How can you, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth (stoma | στόμα) speaks.” – Mathew 15:18
In Scripture, humans are described as having two distinctive minds. One center of power came from the “inner man or heart” and the other was the “outer man or flesh.”
Whichever “mind was in control” determined a person’s thoughts, actions, will and destiny which could either lead a person to their heavenly homeland or their own personal hells.
No one is immune from this law.
The inner man was always in battle or in contrast with the outer לבי ובשׂרי ירננו.
My heart and my flesh cry out Psalm 84:3; מעים Psalm 22:15; Jeremiah 4:19, the inner for outer מעים Jeremiah 49:22; as within the breast על לב Exodus 28:3,29,30
Within the heart is the mind and connection to God.
The heart represents the soul, mind, spirit, will, the whole inner man, that which makes him what he is, a conscious, intelligent, responsible being.
This is symbolized by the Catholic devotion called “The Most Sacred Heart of Jesus (Latin: Cor Jesu Sacratissimum)”, which is seen as a symbol of “God’s boundless and passionate love for mankind”.
In Christian iconography, this is often depicted with Jesus wearing “dual colored clothing” to represent this duality holding a flaming heart shining with divine light.
The heart is the mind where a good person like Jesus operates biologically and a bad or evil person like Satan, his mind was from his stomach as it is said in Luke 6:45;
“The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth (stoma | στόμα | nom sg neut) speaks.”
The reason these people are called evil is that they are ruled by their flesh (sarka), which has a mind of its own.
It is the mind of the material world within the heart of the earth – the domain ruled by the LORD or whom some might call the Devil.
This is why you will see the Devil and his Demons often depicted in Christain art with faces painted upon their stomachs and buttholes.
The biological domain of the so-called Devil that if we do not keep good care of often causes good people to become bad and some evil.
When someone operates from their stomach (stomata), their essentially talking out their ass, which has now become their face.
Yeah, it is like that…
To operate from the heart within the inner man was to be wholehearted and perform tasks wholeheartedly. These were the true men of “courage” and are called “men of the heart.”
The Lord is said to speak “in his heart” (Genesis 8:21); that men “know in their own heart” (Deuteronomy 8:5); that “no one considereth in his heart’ (Isaiah 44:19 the King James Version). “Heart” is this connection to the “mind,” as in Numbers 16:28 (“of mine own mind,” Vulgate (Jerome’s Latin Bible, 390-405 A.D.) ex proprio corde, Septuagint ap’ emautou). The “heart” also seems to represent “conscience,” for which there is no word in Hebrew, as in Job 27:6,
The foolish “is void of understanding,” i.e. “heart” (Proverbs 6:32, where the Septuagint renders phrenon, Vulgate (Jerome’s Latin Bible, 390-405 A.D.) cordis, Luther “der ist ein Narr”).
God is represented as “searching the heart” and “trying the reins” (Jeremiah 17:10 the King James Version).
By doing so, you were conscientious, and considerate and had the courage to act encouragingly for the fainthearted who were controlled by the heart of the earth and as a result, they were the timid and weak people controlled by their flesh.
“And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will destroy with the breath of his mouth (stomatos | στόματος | gen sg neut), and bring to an end with the splendor of his coming.” – Thessalonians 2:8
In contrast, the heart of the earth was connected to the flesh and stomach as told in the story of Jonah being in the “belly of a whale,” like we see in Matthew 12:40:
“For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”
Why are people stuck in some belly and connected to the heart of the earth (biomagneticsphere)?
We read in Matthew 26:41, “Stay alert and pray lest you enter a time of trial. The spirit indeed is willing but the flesh (sarx) is weak.”
The flesh is called sarka, which the scripture informs us that it is related to the human body, 2 Cor. 7:5; flesh, human nature, human frame, Jn. 1:13, 14; 1 Pet. 4:1; 1 and 1 Cor. 5:5; 7:28; materiality, material circumstance, as opposed to the spiritual, Phil. 3:3, 4.
As Romans 8:7 says, “because the mind set on the flesh (sarkos) is hostile to God; it does not submit to the law of God; in fact, it cannot and in Romans 8:8;
“Those controlled by the flesh (sarki) cannot please God.”
These people seem to have a supernatural or medical condition that causes them to be unable to be spiritual or connect with God.
As if their minds and bodies through the flesh are governed by another entity or force that naturally precludes them being able to understand and participate in all that is good.
Scientifically, I contend that they are akin to automatons whose commands are being programed via their second brains in their stomachs i.e., gastrointestinal tracts.
These people who are unconscious to thier own realities then go on to commit various moral and legal crimes, which Paul calls the ‘works of the sarkos’.
“Now the works of the sarkos are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” (Gal 5:19-21)
The reason that people do not obey God and they are ruled by a different force than God is because they have what the Bible calls defiled.
So “what defiles a man?”
We discover that his thoughts are what defile him.
This makes perfect sense because thoughts provide us with the guiding principles in life, which give us direction and meaning in life.
Our beliefs originate from the information we are given from others since we were children to adulthood. These sources include our parents, religion, the media, the government and other people.
Once you understand this simple concept, you then can witness how our whole culture is based on the “works of sarka” .
“Do you not yet realize that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then is eliminated? But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these things defile a man. For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, and slander.” – (Matthew 15:18)
“But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, so that through me the proclamation might be fulfilled, namely, all the Gentiles might hear, and I was rescued from the mouth (stomatos | στόματος | gen sg neut) of a lion.” – 2 Timothy 4:17
We know in Scripture that the symbol of the lion is directly connected to the Devil and to avoid “being eaten,” we must remain both “sober and vigilant” and we must “resist him.”
As it is said in Peter 5:8-9:
“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. Resist him, steadfast in the faith, knowing that the same sufferings are experienced by your brotherhood in the world.”
This Devil I contend works through the stomachs of each and every man, woman and child on earth. No one is immune from this natural law.
The key is knowing the secrets of the Devil and good and evil, which are biological processes that can be controlled by other people if you do not control them your self.
To do so, we all must remain sober.
This means we must refrain from the use of addictive substances such as sugar, alcohol or taking pharmaceutical and intoxicating drugs.
We must also remain vigilant to resist these devilish urges and when they depart, we do not let our guards down because these addictive substances and things in our culture that cause us to slip up i.e.: sin can come back into our lives at anytime for we learn in Luke 4:13:
“Now when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him until an opportune time.”
It is important that we all know that these ancient teachings have been purposely kept secret by the Roman Catholic Church and government in order to control and conquer the world. Today, we are in year 2022 of this plan that is soon one day going to end.
It has to because these ancient impulses that arise in our stomachs are not only pulling the levers of billions of brains, but entire nations with the risk of the entire world being brought down to the depths of hell.
“So that what was spoken by the prophet might be fulfilled, saying, “I will open my mouth (stoma | στόμα) in parables; I will utter things kept secret from the foundation of the world.” – Mathew 13:35
And Jesus proclaimed:
“By the brightness of this light, peoples and nations will be illumined, and they will be warmed by its ardour.”
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Dec 20, 2022 | History of the Brotherhood, Propaganda, Traditionalism
“It is better to marry than to burn. It is better to marry than to be the occasion of death” Pope Gregory the Great had said in the 7th Century.
The first Great Schism in A.D. 1054. between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox was due to a disagreement on priestly celibacy, and the RCC mandates of priestly celibacy have been widely protested by Orthodox Christians in the Eastern Mediterranean world for the last 1500 years.
The first ecumenical council condemned homosexuality, Lateran III of 1179, stated “Whoever shall be found to have committed that incontinence which is against nature” shall be punished, the severity of which depended upon whether the transgressor was a cleric or layperson (quoted in Boswell, 1980, 277).
Church Fathers, Origen, like his teacher St. Clement of Alexandria, had defended the lawfulness of marriage against celibacy in what they had feared were the teachings of demons was a departure from the historic faith as said by Saint Paul in “attaching themselves to demonic doctrines (Timothy 4:1-3).” St. John warns us against such deceiving spirits (John 4:1-6) and them πνεύμα τῆς πλάνης, “the spirit of error.”
Now the Spirit expressly states that in later times some will abandon the faith to follow deceitful spirits and the teachings of demons, influenced by the hypocrisy of liars, whose consciences are seared with a hot iron.…
Today, we may observe a result of these doctrines in the West with the Roman Catholic Church’s pedophile church scandals, unmarked children’s graves, and fewer people identifying with their religion. A 2021 Gallup poll found that Americans’ membership in houses of worship continued to decline in 2020, decreasing below 50% for the first time. In 2020, 47% of Americans said they belonged to a church, synagogue, or mosque, down from 50% in 2018 and 70% in 1999.
Many people and priests in the Western world praise celibacy as an exemplary demonstration of one’s faith in God only and the Church. But there are also many people, scientists, and even Church officials over the last 1500 years who have strongly disagreed with mandatory celibacy and in fact, many believed that it would cause great evils.
The quote I listed above, “It is better to marry than to burn. It is better to marry than to be the occasion of death,” was made by Pope Gregory the Great in the 7th Century shortly after under his authority Rome had issued a decree depriving Catholic Priests of their wives.
Meaning, priestly celibacy, was now officially enforced by Roman Law, which meant that it was illegal to have sex with anyone before. Many of these same said priests were married or had serious relationships, mainly with women.
It was said that sometime after this decree was ordered, Pope Gregory had commanded that some fish should be caught from the local fish ponds, but instead of finding fish, the fishermen reportedly found the heads of six thousand infants who had been drowned in the ponds in order to conceal the priest’s fornications and adulteries.
Upon learning of the horrors of the murders committed by his priests as a result of his Unholy new law, Pope Gregory recalled his decree, and purged the sin with worthy fruits of repentance, extolling the apostolic command:
“It is better to marry than to burn. It is better to marry than to be the occasion of death.”
It appears that Pope Gregory’s prediction was spot on because now 1300 years later, in America and many parts of the world, gay priests and child rape within Church walls have not only become an open secret, they have become a plague infecting our culture at all levels.
Meanwhile, the Roman Catholic Church is in crisis.
Priests all over the world are being arrested and convicted for pedophilia.
There is a shortage of men willing to join the RCC as Church attendance is at its lowest ever. For the last several years, Pope Francis has been hinting that they are considering allowing married men to be ordained to address the Catholic priest shortage.
Today, the Roman Catholic Church requires it for those who are called to be priests and bishops, while the Orthodox Church requires it, for pastoral reasons, only for bishops and priests can marry if they choose to.
However, there were many early Church Fathers, Popes, Christian Philosophers, and commentators who were adamantly against celibacy in the not-so-distant past!
In fact, they believed that it was unnatural, therefore, it was against God’s hierarchy and Natural Law and the end result would be Great Evil.
Since we are at another junction in this 6th Age when the Roman Catholic Church is again debating whether to allow their priests to marry and have children or to remain celibate as American Catholic Priests are openly coming out of the closet cage to the New York Times as homosexuals, I thought it would be enlightening to publish some quotes from history showing us exactly what many imminent Christain authors and philosophers had said about celibacy, effeminism, and homosexuality.
Especially since in our modern era of Sodom and Gomorrah on Steroids 2.0, there is massive disinformation and gay propaganda campaign in the media to falsely claim that the Bible does not speak against homosexuality and these so-called authors are conveniently not revealing what both history and science has already proven this causes.
Science has now found evidence to indicate that an effeminate boy or man is a product of our society forced into the pattern, in part, by the rigid sex-typing of personality required by our society.
For example, one of America’s most influential figures in American sexology, Alfred Kinsey had stated that sexual liberation, as opposed to sexual abstinence, was the key to both a strong marriage and a happy life. Kinsey strongly believed that abstinence was a sexual dysfunction:
“The only kinds of sexual dysfunction are abstinence, celibacy, and delayed marriage.
With that said, I wanted to show you what some of the most imminent and well respected Christain authors had said and written about the act of sodomy that we now call homosexuality.
HISTORY OF CELIBACY AND HOMOSEXUALITY
In Ancient Assyria (1450–1250 BCE), sodomy was punished with castration: “If a man has lain with his male friend and a charge is brought and proved against him, the same thing shall be done to him and he shall be made a eunuch.”
Under Augustus Caesar, to be accused of being effeminate was one of the worst insults that could be said to a man. Augusts had punished male effeminacy in his law treating adultery. To be an effeminate man is the dichotomy created between masculinity and femininity when a man generally chooses to engage outside the traditionally normal roles for males in sports and in their career choices
Under the Vendidad (c. 250–650), the Zoroastrian collection of laws, male homosexuality was understood as an effect of demons: “The man that lies with mankind as man lies with womankind, or as woman lies with mankind, is the man that is a Daeva [demon]; this one is the man that is a worshipper of the Daevas, that is a male paramour of the Daevas.”
PHILO OF ALEXANDRIA
Writing in the first century A.D., philosopher, Philo of Alexandria had equated Sodom’s sin with same-sex sexuality that he believed caused a man to be “unmasculine and effeminate,” a transgression of the gender hierarchy that he called the “greatest of all evils.”
Writing in the first century A.D., philosopher, Philo of Alexandria had equated Sodom’s sin with same-sex sexuality that he believed caused a man to be “unmasculine and effeminate,” a transgression of the gender hierarchy that he called the “greatest of all evils.”
SAINT CLEMENT
Clement of Alexandria’s treatment of marriage is a bond of man and woman based on a free and rational choice, whose greatness lies in the opportunity to bear children which assimilates man to God, the Creator. He believed that the primary purpose of marriage is to produce children by which, according to Plato, one secures for himself a kind of immortality.
uthorities in his treatise on marriage (Strom. II, 23, 137, 1 – III, 18, 110, 3). It shows that Clement widely quotes not only biblical authorities, but also classical authors; in his practical theology he puts great emphasis primarily on Paul the Apostle, Plato, and Aristotle.
St. Clement speaks of marriage as co-operation among the couple, and leads to a kind of harmony; Origen, his disciple, sees in marriage a mutual giving.
ORIGIN OF ALEXANDRIA
Origen defends Christian marriage, as a type of unity of the Church with Christ.
Since God has joined them together (a man and a woman in marriage), for this reason there is a gift for those joined together by God.
To support the institution of marriage as a union blessed and sanctified by God, Clement states an argument from
the gospel, namely the Jesus’ word: “For where two or three gather in my name, there
am I with them.”
Paul knowing this declares that equally with the purity of the holy celibacy is marriage according to the Word of God a gift, saying, “But I would that all men were like myself; howbeit, each man has his own gift from God, one after this manner, and another after that” (1 Cor. 7:7). Those who are joined together by God obey in thought and deed the command “Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also the Church” Eph 5:25.
Using Seneca’s argument from the conduct of animals, he says, “Some women serve lust without any restraint.” indeed I would not compare them to dumb beasts; for beasts, when they conceive, know not to indulge their mates further with their plenty. Intercourse must be suspended until the woman can conceive again.”
The First or Second Century Didache, also known as The Lord’s Teaching Through the Twelve Apostles to the Nations, an early Christian treatise written in Koine Greek, had said;
“You shall not commit murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit pederasty, you shall not commit fornication, you shall not steal, you shall not practice magic, you shall not practice witchcraft, you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill one that has been born.” (Didache 2:2 A.D. 70).
. Cicero says, “There exist certain precepts, even laws, that prohibit a man from being effeminate in pain,”[12] and Seneca adds, “If I must suffer illness, it will be my wish to do nothing out of control, nothing effeminately.”
In early Rome, legislators and the Roman Elite had a problem with older males raping their children so they instituted what is called the Lex Scantinia. This law protected minor males of noble families (ingenui) from being raped by older males. It was said to have been enacted around 149 B.C.E.
Justin Martyr writing in 151 A.D. said;
“We have been taught that to expose newly-born children is the part of wicked men, and this we have been taught lest we should do anyone harm and lest we should sin against God, first, because we see that almost all so exposed (not only the girls but also the males) are brought up to prostitution.
And for this pollution, a multitude of females and hermaphrodites, and those who commit unmentionable iniquities, are found in every nation. And you receive the hire of these, and duty and taxes from them, whom you ought to exterminate from your realm. . . . And there are some who prostitute even their own children and wives, and some who are openly mutilated for the purpose of sodomy; and they refer these mysteries to the mother of the gods” (First Apology 27 A.D. 151).
At one of the first worldwide meetings of the Churches at the Council of Nicea, called by Emperor Constantine in A.D. 325 to address the problem of heresies, the Chruch voted against celibacy at the conclusion of the council.
The late Roman Empire finally promulgated the first European law openly prohibiting sodomy in 390. The law was part of a code of laws set forth by Emperor Theodosius (c. 345–395), who was under the influence of the Christian Church.
The church’s policy was defined by Augustine (354–430), who, following the apostle Paul, determined that sexual pleasure was permissible only as procreation within marriage. Because homosexuality, as with adultery, was a sin, its punishment was penance imposed by the church rather than by secular authority.
The Byzantine emperor Justinian (c. 482–565) outlawed homosexuality in 533 in the Justinian Code, persons who engaged in homosexual sex were to be executed, although those who were repentant could be spared.
In 693, the Visigoths in Spain, Egica, monarch of “Spain” pleads with the 16th Council of bishops at Toledo to deal more firmly with “that obscene crime committed by those (clergymen) who lie with males.” The Council sets punishment as removal from office, castration, ex-communication, 100 lashes, exile. Egica decrees similar punishments on non-clergy as a matter of civil law, increasing the harshness of prior law.
Saint Thomas Aquinas ( ? – d. 1274) theorizes that all human sexual activity was intended by God to be solely for the purpose of producing children. Therefore any other sort of sexual doing was sinful and “unnatural.”
Several saint-bishops, including Thomas Becket, were apparently advised by their doctors that they should abandon celibacy for the sake of their health – although they always refused to do so. Non-clerics were also at risk, especially if they went on prolonged military campaigns. Louis VII of France became ill after spending two months besieging a Burgundian town, and his doctors agreed that ‘prolonged abstinence from sexual intercourse had cause his indisposition.’ One account of the Third Crusade claimed that ‘A hundred thousand men died there/ Because from women they abstained.’
In the 19th century, there was a significant reduction in the legal penalties for sodomy. After the French Revolution in 1789, the Napoleonic code decriminalized sodomy, and with Napoleon’s conquests that Code spread.
Sodomy was omitted from the penal code, and again from the code adopted in France in 1810. The basic concepts of the 1810 code also became the basis for much of the law in Spanish South America.
The Napoleonic code decriminalized sodomy, and with Napoleon’s liberal conquests, Code spread, and so did sodomy and sexual perversions.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Dec 15, 2022 | Neoliberalism, Philosophy, Satanism, Traditionalism
I believe we each live in a multipolar world that is ruled by magnetism. These worlds act just like magnets attracting and repulsing people based on the quality of their DNA, thoughts, ideas, and actions or inactions.
These thoughts, lack thereof, and action processes are also magnetic.
We know that magnetism is the result of an object or energy that is either spinning up, down, or not at all.
Science has proven that humans are also part of this magnetic process. We can now measure and quantify a person’s thoughts via their magnetic field with special magnetic resonance machines.
Like magnets, humans are either spinning up, down, or not at all.
There is a group of magnetized humans that I contend participate outside the Forms of Good of the World Soul/Noosphere and our accepted Ancient Traditions.
People who are of like energies or none at all, spin the same way so naturally, they will be magnetized to organizations and people who “speak their language.”
In this sense, we can say they scientifically align their minds with the other weak minds who follow the modern-day cargo cults of atheism and the Left-Hand Path ie Counterclockwise Path – the path of the Individual and Satanism.
There is also research that I believe explains why some humans are naturally magnetized and attracted to the material world, atheism, and Satanism, and why I theorize that they spin down.
Instead of being in rhythm with the world, they become arrhythmic and spin down.
To be an individualistic or Satanic human is a result of spinning down, which is symbolized in the occult by the inverted pentagram and upside-down cross.
To become an energy and people magnet ie a Satanic Individual that absorbs and attracts like energies in a vampish fashion of everyone and everything around you.
To consciously do this is to participate in the noosphere but often ends in destruction and death for most people who chose this path.
The path of the selfish human.
The spinning path that leads to the underworld or what the Greeks had called Acheron makes people beasts who often morph into demons taking everyone around them down to what Christians call hell.
This is why they proudly profess to follow the adversary, Satan or they have no God thus becoming zealous atheists hell-bent on attacking the world’s Traditions on their Twitter accounts.
A New World Order made up of mostly Satanists ie: Liberal atheists and agnostics who seek to usurp God’s natural hierarchy/community to follow their own ideas in disorder to create self-made religions, cults, philosophies, and God forbid, online coaching courses on how you can learn to be just like them.
In a sense, they flip their middle fingers proudly at our Ancient Traditions. Like fallen angels and their Beastly hero, Satan, they labor in the world of Do Thou Wilt is the Whole of the Law as they pervert and magnetize our nation’s youth into their cults.
These people are often magnetically repelled, opposed, and more often than not, engaged in active attacks against the ideas of our religious and philosophical Traditions i.e Plato’s Forms of Good and God’s communities.
With the advent of the internet, which is just a big magnet in the sky, I believe that these people are creating a Satanic world of individuals who all mimic and copy one another as they magnetize each other into Hell (bowels of the earth).
In researching what biological phenomena may be causing people to become a type of automaton, I found that within our gi tracts is what is called the “myenteric plexus” which plays a major role in controlling our “motor skills.” It is the inner plexus that is located in the submucosal region between the circular muscle and the mucos controlling GI secretions and local blood flow.
You wil find that the myenteric plexus can be electrically depolarized or hyperpolarized depending on the person’s gut health.
This science connects with my spin down theory because Spin polarization is the degree to which the spin, i.e., the intrinsic angular momentum of elementary particles, is aligned with a given direction. … Spin polarization of electrons or of nuclei, often called simply magnetization, is also produced by the application of a magnetic field.
In biology, depolarization is a change within a cell, during which the cell undergoes a shift in electric charge distribution, resulting in less negative charge inside the cell.
Depolarization is essential to the function of many cells, communication between cells, and the overall physiology of an organism.
As I have explained, humans are like magnets, and in being so, we are also like a radio with an antenna, i.e. the brain in our skulls and also the second brain in our bowels that can receive outside communication signals and also control various thought processes.
In researching what biological phenomena may be causing people to become a type of automaton, I found that within our gi tracts is what is called the “myenteric plexus” which plays a major role in controlling our “motor skills.” It is the inner plexus that is located in the submucosal region between the circular muscle and the mucus controlling GI secretions and local blood flow.
You will find that the myenteric plexus can be electrically depolarized or hyperpolarized depending on the person’s gut health.
This science connects with my spin down theory because Spin polarization is the degree to which the spin, i.e., the intrinsic angular momentum of elementary particles, is aligned with a given direction. … Spin polarization of electrons or of nuclei, often called simply magnetization, is also produced by the application of a magnetic field.
In biology, depolarization is a change within a cell, during which the cell undergoes a shift in electric charge distribution, resulting in less negative charge inside the cell.
Depolarization is essential to the function of many cells, communication between cells, and the overall physiology of an organism.
As I have explained, humans are like magnets, and in being so, we are also like a radio with an antenna, i.e. the brain in our skulls and also the second brain in our bowels that can receive outside communication signals and also control various thought processes.
Hence, I contend that depending upon the human, their health, and the quality of their thinking and reasoning or lack thereof will determine de facto how they spin or more appropriately, where they are magnetizing via their thoughts and lives – up to heaven ie Vitruvian Man, Christ Consciousness and Plato’s realm of Ideas or via the bowels – down to the earthly, material and animal realm – where Hades rules the 666 Beast Men.
The sons and daughters of the Devil who controls the little noos or false noos.
The magnetic path that leads to disorder, destruction, and death i.e. hell!
RESEARCH:
A 2012 study stated;
“The myenteric plexus of the enteric nervous system lies between the circular and longitudinal layers of the muscularis externa and is the main neuronal regulator of intestinal motor function. The rhythmicity of intestinal motor function is tied to the intrinsic oscillating transmembrane potential of the ICCs and is propagated among smooth muscle cells via membrane gap junctions.
Enteric nerves serve to alter smooth muscle membrane potentials to depolarize or hyperpolarize, such that oscillating changes in potential become closer to or further from the threshold at which spike potentials, as well as resultant muscle cell contraction, occur.”
See more @ Science Direct
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
