The Grandfather of Modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley (1875-1947) was a British occultist, black magician, author, and secret British spy who is one of the most well-known and controversial figures of the 20th-century.
He drew quite a following from the British upper classes, who had a preoccupation with the occult and networked extensively in artistic and literary scenes where he felt perfectly at home in these circles of the elite.
Crowley gained much notoriety during his lifetime, being a demon conjurer, recreational drug experimenter, bisexual, and an individualist social critic.
Much of the controversy surrounding him came through an association with ritual sex magick and the Enochian magick that had been practiced by the infamous consultant to Queen Elizabeth, John Dee (1527-1608).
Dee used a grimoire called the Goetia (or the Lesser Key of Solomon) for conjuring angels and demons. Crowley considered himself to be the reincarnation of Dee’s assistant, necromancer and interpreter of the angelic language, Edward Kelly (1555-1597).
It was early in the 20th century when Crowley proudly proclaimed himself The Great Beast 666, who believed or acted as if he was an agent of the devil in order to help bring about humanity’s spiritual evolution.
He considered himself to be the prophet of a new age – the Æon of Horus and his religion Thelema, whose law was, “Do what thou wilt, shall be the whole of the Law.”
As he once said, “I was not content to believe in a personal devil and serve him, in the ordinary sense of the word. I wanted to get hold of him personally and become his chief of staff.” And “There are no “standards of Right”.
Ethics is balderdash. Each Star must go on its own orbit. To hell with “moral principle”; there is no such thing.” (Aleister Crowley, The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL)
This is why the British press once labeled him “The Wickedest Man In the World,” and a 1915 Vanity Fair profile put it well, “a legend has been built up around his name. He is a myth. No other man has so many strange tales told of him.”
In addition to working for the British government, he helped spawn several Satanic organizations and influenced millions of people in the process. I argue that Crowley’s influence and propaganda helped make him the Grandfather of Modern Satanism, and I believe we can also call him the founder of Modern Atheism and Neo-Liberalism.
Crowley can be credited with influencing millions of people in the Western world with his brand of individualistic religion in the counter-culture generation from the 1960s to the 1970s up until this very day.
This is why some of his critics argue that he is also responsible for spawning a whole generation of witches, warlocks, and degenerates, in addition to being an influence on modern Satanism.
When you study his life, you will find that Crowley’s statement about being the Devil’s chief of staff may very well be true. He had worked his whole life to facilitate the removal of obstacles in Western culture, such as morality and Christian values, in order to bring about the end-time.
Whether most of Crowley’s antics and life were the product of self-will, the Devil or financed and controlled by British intelligence agencies still remains somewhat of a mystery.
One thing is for certain – his mission was to spread his brand of Satanic ethos around the world through his books and counter-culture religion of Thelema.
In fact, I believe his mission was a global success, as you will see.
Crowley’s most famous work was The Book of the Law, which he claimed to have received telepathically in June 1904 in Cairo, Egypt from a self-described supernatural entity named Aiwass. It is important to note that he identified Aiwass with Satan and with Horus’ brother Seth, which is the ancient Egyptian equivalent to the Devil in Christianity.
Thelema was primarily developed by Crowley through his written works during his lifetime. But it has continued to evolve under subsequent generations of Thelemites and Satanists who have added new interpretations and practices to it. Crowley’s Book of the Law has gone on to become a sacred text to many Left Hand Path practitioners.
It is also accepted as official writing by the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O), a secret society based on sex magick of German origin.
The book predicted that humanity was ready to enter a new period of spiritual evolution, known as the “Æon of Horus” (Age of Aquarius). A new era that was supposed to be characterized by humanity embracing spiritual freedom absent from moral and social restraint.
Crowley believed that humanity could be re-initiated into a spiritualized state of existence through immoral activities and the practice of ritual sex magic and the use of drugs such as heroin, and especially cocaine, which he called “the great weapon against stupidity.”
This is why Crowley’s teachings are the complete opposite of Judeo-Christianity’s core philosophical concepts of Brotherly Love, Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself and Treat People How You Want to be Treated. Hence, the reason they are considered immoral and Satanic.
In The Book of the Law, the Satanic entity, Aiwass allegedly dictated three chapters to Crowley that are now considered to be some of the core principles that describe a philosophy he calls “Thelema.” Thelema is derived from the Greek word for “will” and is a religion of the Law of Thelema.
It is essentially an atheist, individualistic, and magical philosophy, which denies the existence of God and the Devil, and states several proclamations such as, “there is no other god but Man;” “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”. “Love is the law, love under will,” and “Every man and every woman is a star.”
“Worship me with wines and strange drugs whereof I shall tell my prophet, and be drunk thereof! They shall not harm ye at all!” proclaimed The Book of the Law.
When one examines Crolwey’s philosophy of Thelema you will find that it is based on extreme liberalization and the individuality of a person to forge their own path in the world without any regard for morals, ethics, or the collective good of their communities. It simply means that the practitioner is encouraged to discover their True Will, whatever that may be, and to do it.
An individual should act according to his or her own will, which he defined as “love under will.” Love under will means that you love yourself and what you want to do with your life so much that you are willing to do anything to achieve your goals.
While on the surface, this philosophy does not appear to be bad or in the religious sense, evil. It is a way of life for people to do whatever you want, from promiscuous, bisexual, and homosexual sex to black magick, hardcore drugs, and lead to nihilistic self-destruction.
A type of hive mind that targets our lower and animal natures via sex and our material pleasures, making it easy to penetrate and manipulate people and the public as a whole.
What I contend creates a nationalistic “American Satanic State of Mind.”
Hell, that may have been the whole point behind his devilish mission, and if it was tied to a secret counter-intelligence operation to manipulate the public, it could be considered brilliant and Crowley, a secret agent legend among spies and occultists.
Crowley’s introduction to the London occult scene came in 1898, when he was initiated into the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Crowley had also founded the religion of Thelema, which became adopted by the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.), as well as the magical order Argenteum Astrum (Silver Star), or A∴A∴, the Order’s parent organization, and the first magical order that Crowley founded.
Several organizations were formed thereafter modeled on his teachings, of which many were founded by former members of the Golden Dawn and the Ordo Templi Orientis.
Other groups like the Church of Scientology, The Process Church of the Final Judgment, Church of Satan, and Temple of Set can all be attributed to Crowley’s lineage or an offshoot of his Satanic ideologies.
From 1909 to 1913, Crowley published the periodical called The Equinox, which was the official magazine of the Astrum Argentum (A:.A:.). Researcher, Mark Morrison claimed that, “[Crowley] needed the magazine to lend an aura of scientific, and even experimental, legitimacy to his ‘scientific illuminism,’ as he styled the mission of the A.A.”
From 1905 until the early 1940’s Crowley produced an impressive number of books on the subjects of ritual theory, magick, and yoga.
He also wrote novels (Diary of a Drug Fiend, Moonchild) and plays. In the summer of 1911, Crowley wrote his first “sex magick” treatise called Liber Stellae Rubeae (The Book of the Ruby Star) in which the star ruby represents the lingam (the Tantric phallus). This book, which was deemed holy by Crowley, “was [his] first formal ritual expression of the dynamics of sexual magic.
He wrote Magick In Theory And Practice, which was first published in Paris in 1929 under the pseudonym of “Aleister Ataturk.” Weiser Books then reissued it in 1972 with an introduction by Israel Regardie. The book is still in print today and has sold well over 3 million copies worldwide.
Many of the figures I mention below and in the next chapter were and still are extremely influential upon Western society through their books, movies, and music.
All of which had a huge impact on liberalizing the minds of millions of teenage children and young adults who sought to embrace and mimic their lifestyles of “Do Thou Wilt.”
Famous authors such as Jack Kerouac and William S. Burroughs, both of whom were Beat Generation writers who wrote about their experiences with drugs and the occult.
Also Ian Fleming (who used elements of Crowley’s life in his James Bond novels), J.G. Ballard (who based some characters on Crowley in Crash), and John Fowles (who used Crowley as inspiration for the character Professor Slocombe in The Magus).
Jack Parsons, who was a rocket scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and CalTech. Parsons was also an influential member of the Ordo Templi Orientis, often referred to as the O.T.O., an occult organization that Crowley founded in 1907.
He would later become a successful rocket scientist after his exposure to the teachings of Crowley, who saw him as the “magus” or high priest of his new religion.
Parsons would use his skills to help NASA develop rockets for space exploration and research, including working on the V-2 rockets during World War II that were designed by Wernher von Braun (who later helped develop America’s first satellite).
Another figure influenced by Crowley was former Naval intelligence officer who became the founder of the Church of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard.
He became one of America’s most famous writers after writing The Book of Dzyan in New York City in 1934 while studying with Crowley himself.
Crowley would also be idolized by Timothy Leary, a famous psychologist who experimented with LSD in the 1960s and 1970s. He wrote about his experiences in The PsychTimothyedelic Experience: A Manual Based on The Tibetan Book of the Dead.
Leary said that he had been inspired by Crowley’s book Liber AL vel Legis (The Book of the Law), which he called “the most enlightened statement ever written”.
In addition, Crowley had a huge impact on many other famous Satanists and occultists like Kenneth Anger, Kenneth Grant, Gerald Gardner (founder of Wicca), Robert Anton Wilson (author of Illuminatus), and Damien Echols (Convicted Child Murderer – West Memphis Three).
Kenneth Grant wrote several books about him and his ideas (including The Magical Revival) and he was friends with Dennis Wheatley, whose books include several novels based on Crowley’s ideas (Wheatley even wrote a biography of Crowley).
When I examine the chain of events that led to the formation of Satanic State of America, I see the true aristocratic bloodline of Modern Satanism. The evidence proves that Crowley’s Satanic influence upon American, British, and Western culture, in general, has been incredibly profound.
Today, we can see how his philosophy is deeply rooted within American culture with the help of many artists in the music industry, authors, filmmakers, and the tens of millions of people who were influenced by these same people.
The Grandfather of Modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley, The Golden Dawn, and the O.T.O. were the Satanic seeds in America and the West that were the origin of this underground movement. The famous people, celebrities, and bands who emulated these teachings would be the resulting infection spreadingnSatanism around the globe.
Crowley and his fellow Satanists would be the viral contagion that, with clever marketing, media, and the secret help of intelligence agencies, hijacked the music movement acting as its superspreaders.
Up out of hell would sprout like mushrooms the likes of Anton LaVey with the Church of Satan Inc., The Process Church of the Final Judgment, and the U.S. Army Col., Michael Aquino and his brand of Scientific Satanism called the Temple of Set. Aquino’s brand of scientific-based occultism and black magic would be the perfect fit for modern warfare as head of Army Psyops instituting the Mind Wars.
All of whom would incorporate it all into their own brands of official Satanic doctrine—indoctrinating a whole generation of wayward youth, spawning some of the best rock, heavy metal, punk bands, and spies the world has ever witnessed.
Like they were spawned from the abyss, Satanists on the fringe side of the movement would birth serial killers like David Berkowitz (The Son of Sam), Richard Ramirez, and one of the most celebrated, Charles Manson, whose Satanic adventures I will also share with you coming up.
I do not contend that all these different people that I have mentioned or will mention in the next chapters were all magically managed by Crowley. Nor were they an organized group or had any type of central planning. They were all Satanists who individually forged their own paths.
What I do propose was that much of the movement was the end result of Crowley’s ideas, magic, and his brand of Satanic ethos being “Do thou wilt.” An individualistic, neoliberal, immoral and sometimes criminal way of life that all have a common source of origin.
That source was Crowley.
And all the while, he was a secret spy working as an asset for British intelligence, as I will also detail in a following chapter.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
Something dark and evil is happening to children who attend the U.S. public school system. There are many K-12 kids who are being sexually groomed, abused, molested, and raped by school employees, and it is getting worse every year.
The school employees who are committing these horrendous crimes include teachers, substitute teachers, coaches, and even principals. Investigators have found that school officials and their unions often try to hide the details to protect their own.
In 2006, Kurt Eichenwald, investigative reporter for The New York Times, went deep into the dark online world of pedophile chat rooms, and reported, “The most frequent job mentioned, however, was schoolteacher,” he wrote. “A number of self-described teachers shared detailed observations about children in their classes, including events they considered sexual, like a second-grade boy holding his crotch during class.”
According to a recent FOX 5 news investigation in school districts across the country, approximately 135 teachers and teachers’ aides have been arrested so far in 2022 on child sex-related crimes in the U.S., ranging from child pornography to raping students. This data was only based on publicized events and the actual number may well be higher.
A quick Google search of school employees on student sexual crime reveals a plethora of arrests that seem to occur just about every day. Here is a small sampling of news reports and please remember that these are only the teachers who have been caught. There are most likely many more who are still preying on America’s children.
For example, in June 2022, Honolulu FBI agents executed search warrants on a homosexual substitute teacher’s home after allegations that he had raped a a 13-year-old boy during lunch breaks on school grounds.
Alden Bunag (34) was arrested at Oahu’s Pearl City High School (PCHS), where he confessed to police investigators that he had been groomed and had sex with the underage boy. Bunag told police that he was aware of the child’s age.
He also brazingly recorded the sexual encounters and shared them with another teacher employed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who was also charged with distributing child pornography.
Bunag was also active on the internet and Twitter. He was a self-described “Socialist” and member of the LGBT community who often tweeted his political and sexual views openly online before he raped the 13 year old boy.
Someone has since deleted all his social media accounts after his arrest, but some people took these screen shots before they were taken down.
In researching Bunag’s Twiiter account, it appears that he was active in defending his right to talk to his students about sex, and when he was accused of grooming children, he adamantly denied doing so.
In June 2022, a former North Carolina band teacher, Peter Frank, was found guilty of sex crimes involving a student at the Roland-Grise Middle School, and was sentenced to at least 50 years in prison.
Frank was found guilty on two counts of first-degree sexual offense, four counts of statutory sex offense with a person who is 13, 14, or 15, one count of sexual activity with a student, seven counts of indecent liberties with a child, and three counts of indecent liberties with a student, WECT-TV reported.
According to Star News, “Frank was arrested in 2020. He was one of three teachers arrested over a two-year period for allegedly committing sex crimes with his students — Michael Kelly was taken into custody in February 2018 and later pleaded guilty to 59 charges for sex crimes, and Nicholas Oates was arrested in July 2018 but died before heading to trial.”
In February 2022, a former Louisiana teacher who pleaded guilty to tainting cupcakes with her ex-husband’s bodily fluids and feeding them to school children was sentenced Friday to 41 years in prison, according to US News.
Authorities said Cynthia Perkins committed the acts with her ex, Dennis Perkins, a former Livingston Parish sheriff’s lieutenant.
US News reported that Perkins issued a lengthy apology before the sentencing.
“I would also like to apologize to my three children. I haven’t spoken to them in three years. I love them and I miss them, and I’m sorry,” Perkins said.
But one of her children, born during her first marriage, described her in a letter to the court as a “horrible” and “manipulative” mother.
“My life is so much better without you,” the letter read.
I could go on and on with example after example of school employees committing sexual crimes. If you choose to research this more on your own, you will find hundreds, if not, thousands of news reports verifying the facts I state in this article.
SCHOOL EMPLOYEE SEXUAL CRIME STATISTICS
In 2002, the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) issued a report called, “Professional Perpetrators: Sex Offenders Who Use Their Employment To Target and Sexually Abuse the Children With Whom They Work.” The USDOJ said;
“Any organization or institution, whether statutory or voluntary, that cares for children is vulnerable to infiltration by professionals who intend to abuse the children, including child care institutions, foster care, churches, schools, and voluntary organizations. Faller (1988) found that the majority of offenders in an institutional setting were deliberately seeking situations in which they might abuse children.”
Section 5414 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, requires “a national study of sexual abuse in schools.” The results were published in a 2004 Department of Education (DOE) study that found nearly 10 percent of K-12 students have been victims of sexual misconduct by a school employee.
To show how grim the numbers are, the report said 422,000 California public-school students would be victims before graduation. That is just one state.
These teacher sexual predators and pedophiles are being protected by schools officials and their powerful unions who are attempting to cover up these facts by hiding files and evading investigations.
In 2003, the Dallas Morning News (Jennings and Tharp, May 2003) and the other in the Seattle Times (Willmsen and O’Hagan, December 2003), examined educator sexual misconduct in their respective states.
Jennings and Tharp focused on 606 cases of educator sexual misconduct from Texas State Board of Educator Certification records and Willmsen and O’Hagan targeted abuse by coaches. In both instances, reporters commented on the difficulty of obtaining information on educator sexual misconduct.
O’Hagan and Willmsen (Dec. 14, 2003) write:
When the Seattle Times asked the Bellevue School District for information about teachers and coaches accused of sexual misconduct, school officials and the state’s most powerful union teamed up behind the scenes to try to hide the files. Bellevue school officials even let teachers purge their own records at union-organized “file parties” to prevent disclosure.”
A 2018 study by the Education Department found that reports of sexual assaults at elementary, middle, and high schools increased sharply by 55 percent, from approximately 9,600 in 2015-2016 to about 15,000 in 2017-2018.
The report defines sexual assault as involving threatened rape, fondling, indecent liberties, or child molestation. Both male and female students can be victims of sexual assault.
Parents need to understand that this increase is strongly associated with public school employees sexually assaulting children.
This news is tragic because it’s been documented that victims of child sexual abuse are at a much higher risk of developing long-term mental health issues and physical disorders such as depression, guilt, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Many researchers claim that child sexual abuse leads to more attempts at self-harm, drug abuse, suicides and can change a person forever.
According to a recent study published in JAMA Network Open: Pediatrics, childhood abuse, whether sexual, emotional, or physical in nature, is significantly associated with higher rates of suicide attempts. Researchers found that sexual abuse was associated with a 4-fold increased odds for suicide plans (OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.44-6.95) and a 3.5-fold increased odds for suicide attempts (odds ratio (OR) 3.42; 95% CI, 2.90-4.00).
Our schools are supposed to keep children safe from sexual assaults, abuse and other acts of violence. Unfortunately, they have become breeding grounds for child abusers to prey upon our kids, and they often go unpunished and simply move from one school to the next so they can repeat their sickening behaviors.
Any school, institution, or person that has allowed children to be harmed by sexual predators deserves to be taken to task for it.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger had bluntly stated in her 1922 pamphlet, The Pivot of Civilization, “birth control,” a term she coined, as “the process of weeding out the unfit” was aimed at “the creation of a superman.”
She was also influenced by Henry Havelock Ellis (2 February 1859 – 8 July 1939), a British sexologist, who wrote that under-educated women needed contraception so they wouldn’t pass on their “weakness” to their offspring.
Sanger once wrote: “The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over fertility of those who are physically, mentally, and morally unfit.”
This plan also focused on African Americans using religion and their own people.
In 1922, Sanger wrote: “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal…. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”
Sanger’s organization, Planned Parenthood, has been responsible for countless abortions and birth control measures, but her legacy has been largely forgotten by today’s feminists and African Americans.
Sanger’s background was linked to eugenics, an ideology based on improving human hereditary traits through social intervention. Eugenics was popular in America from the late 19th century through the mid-20th century.
The idea behind eugenics was that if you wanted to get rid of people who were criminals or mentally ill or poor or whatever else, then you should prevent them from having children. In an article in her magazine Birth Control Review, she wrote: “More children from the fit, less from the unfit—that is the chief aim of Eugenics.”
This is why it was so closely associated with birth control and still is to this very day, and her baby killing propaganda has worked wonders on the feeble American mind to the point that the CDC reported 629,898 abortions in 2019, the last full year of available data.
Sanger’s American Eugenics program focused on identifying those with “undesirable” traits and preventing them from reproducing; in some cases, this involved forced sterilization or euthanasia.
She called for legislation “for the sterilization of failure-prone individuals,” and even published a paper entitled “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda,” which argued that birth control should be used as a method for controlling populations deemed unworthy by the state.
Yes, including today’s feminists, who many belong to the very same undesirable groups she identifies as whose babies need to be simply murdered.
Rather than educate and help lower and middle class women with guidance on proper nutrition, hygiene, and adequate health care to raise their children, Sanger argues that our society as a whole would be better off with these children dead.
This may seem like hyperbole – until you read her own words.
In fact, Margret Sanger was not shy in expressing her opinions on the mass killing of babies.
As I mentioned above, she had written that “the most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” and that “all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the evils of too prolific breeding among wage-workers .”
“Many, perhaps, will think it idle to go farther in demonstrating the immorality of large families, but since there is still an abundance of proof at hand, it may be offered for the sake of those who find difficulty in adjusting old-fashioned ideas to the facts.
The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.
The same factors which create the terrible infant mortality rate, and which swell the death rate of children between the ages of one and five, operate even more extensively to lower the health rate of the surviving members. Moreover, the overcrowded homes of large families reared in poverty further contribute to this condition.
Lack of medical attention is still another factor, so that the child who must struggle for health in competition with other members of a closely packed family has still great difficulties to meet after its poor constitution and malnutrition have been accounted for.”
Margret Sanger had complete disdain towards the middle and lower classes in America. The very people who we call today “essential workers” that keep our economy and the system operating.
In fact, Sanger wanted to kill them all!
The unworthy obviously include all criminals, paupers, and work-shirkers. They should either be segregated or eliminated by some humane form of euthanasia. The worthy class would include only those who are physically fit (no cripples or lunatics), mentally capable (no idiots), and morally sound (no criminals).
In “The Morality of Birth Control”, a 1921 speech, she divided society into three groups: the “educated and informed” class that regulated the size of their families, the “intelligent and responsible” who desired to control their families in spite of lacking the means or the knowledge, and the “irresponsible and reckless people” whose religious scruples “prevent their exercising control over their numbers”.
Sanger emphatically states, “There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.”
The probability of a child handicapped by a weak constitution, an overcrowded home, inadequate food and care, and possibly a deficient mental equipment, winding up in prison or an almshouse, is too evident for comment. Every jail, hospital for the insane, reformatory and institution for the feebleminded cries out against the evils of too prolific breeding among wage-workers,” she said.
In 1939, Sanger wrote in her autobiography: “When I became convinced that there was no reasonable hope of converting the American people to birth control through voluntary education, I decided to devote what time I had left in America to establishing a clinic which would be dedicated to its principles.”
In October 1939, Sanger opened her first birth control clinic in Brownsville, Brooklyn. It was closed by police after three days, but reopened two weeks later under the direction of Sanger’s associate, Mary Lasker. The next year, 1940, Sanger opened another clinic in Harlem; it was closed by police after three months.
Like we see today, Margaret Sanger was the person who introduced the evil propaganda women are not free unless they can control their bodies and decide whether or they will be a mother. Meaning, that if these women do not have the power to kill their unborn babies, then they are not free people.
Sanger wrote;
“No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her body. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother.”
“Woman must have her freedom, the fundamental freedom of choosing whether or not she will be a mother and how many children she will have. Regardless of what man’s attitude may be, that problem is hers — and before it can be his, it is hers alone.
She goes through the vale of death alone, each time a babe is born. As it is the right neither of man nor the state to coerce her into this ordeal, so it is her right to decide whether she will endure it.” (Woman and the New Race)
In her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilization, she wrote: “As an example of what I mean by intelligent direction of fecundity. . . . wee should require that every woman be taught how to perform her own abortion and that there should be erected throughout this nation free clinics where abortions would be performed at public expense.”
As a result of her work and government funding, Sanger co-founded an organization called the American Birth Control League (ABCL) in 1921 and then two years later renamed it The Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA). She served as president of the American Birth Control League from 1922 until 1929, when it was renamed Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA).
Her successor as president was Frederick J. Taussig, an economist and friend who had helped her found PPFA. In 1936 PPFA merged with Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau to form Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA).
When you research the work and quotes from Margret Sanger as I provided just a few above, you find a very cold, psychopathic intellectual who provides the ideology and foundational premises for the like minded monsters (demons) who will actually carry out the business-end of her evil intentions.
Today, she is loved and admired mainly by the Democrats and the political Left in this country.
Sanger’s evil plans seemed to have worked like a charm on those weak American minds who follow her baby-killing gospel to this very day. Even to their own detriment.
People, if that is what you want to call them, who have no qualms at killing their own babies and euthenizing the morally and mentally unfit – meaning their own families.
The very population she wanted to kill is not only demanding the freedom to murder their own babies, if needed be, they will kill you for the right to do so!
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
“Traditionalism is the only way to preserve the world.” – Julius Evola
Traditionalism is a reactionary and counter-revolutionary movement that arose in the early 20th century. Traditionalists believe that there is a spiritual decay in Western civilization owing to modernity and rationalism, which they see as being based on Judeo-Christian values and defines itself as “a philosophy which favors traditionalism, hierarchy, and authority”.
The word “Traditionalism” derives from the Latin word tradere, which means “to hand down”. The term “traditionalist” derives from “traditional”, which refers to the commonalities between all traditions, or customarily accepted beliefs and practices.
It is a school of thought that believes in the primacy of the wisdom and knowledge of traditional societies, especially those that existed prior to the modern period or what is often called Modernity by Tradionialists. They affirm that there is a transcendent order, which constitutes the objective reality of human experience.
The transcendent order as the “Traditional” or “Perennial” Way, and and advocates the return to “the Old Ways” which they believe has been manifested in all cultures at all times.
Over the last 200 years, Traditionalist thinkers have criticized modernity and liberalism, while advocating a return to our original values and ways of life. It is not a unified movement, but rather various different traditions that have existed throughout history under this name.
The term “traditionalism” was first used as a self-descriptor by French writer François-René de Chateaubriand in 1821, although tradition had been used prior to this by Joseph de Maistre and other counterrevolutionaries. These ideas have been popularized by a number of writers and thinkers in Europe, Russia, and America. They include Julius Evola, René Guénon, Martin Heidegger, Carl Schmitt, and Aleksandr Dugin.
Traditionalism can be seen as an attempt to preserve the traditionalist ethos against modernizing trends in Western culture. This includes preserving the identity and customs of one’s people from the erosion of globalism and multiculturalism, which are seen as diluting traditional values and religion with foreign influences; for example: Christianity replacing paganism in Europe or Hinduism replacing Buddhism in India.
The traditionalist worldview sees humanity as being on a spiritual journey through time; it sees all religions as having an essential truth about this journey; it sees modernity as bringing us further away from this truth; and it sees modernity as being associated with increasing inequality, injustice and environmental destruction.
Traditionalists reject universalizing ideologies such as rationalism (the idea that reason is supreme), liberalism (the idea that individual rights are paramount) and socialism (the idea that government should be controlled by the community).
They have traditionally been opposed to both communism and capitalism, which they regard as modern manifestations of an anti-traditional system of society. They are also often opposed to progressivism and industrialization for similar reasons.
Traditionalists believe these ideologies are contrary to human nature and lead to moral decay because they undermine natural hierarchies.
Many Traditionalists believe that our present condition is due not just to bad politics but also to bad ideas (because politics are always based on ideas). Bad ideas that simply need to be destroyed. They believe that there has been a decadence of thought since modern times began, which has resulted in all kinds of irrational beliefs such as materialism, atheism, and liberalism.
Traditionalists believe that various aspects of society and social life are organic wholes that exist whether or not humans recognize or acknowledge their existence. They further believe that these wholes have an inborn “spirit” or “soul” that one can only understand intuitively, rather than rationally.
Traditionalists thus reject abstract rationalist notions like natural rights and social contract theory as a basis for legitimacy and authority. Instead, they espouse an organicist conception of society as a living organism with a spiritual soul through which “legitimate” authority must be exercised.
It is opposed by both liberal individualism and modernist historicism in all its forms. It rejects what it sees as the rootless cosmopolitanism inherent to modernity—including capitalism, individualism, egalitarianism and multiculturalism—as well as the secularization of religion into a mere human institution devoid of its transcendent purpose.
They argue that society has been thrown into confusion by waves of materialistic thinking and has forgotten its spiritual foundation. They wish to restore religious practices and beliefs that are not bound by time or space.
Some traditionalists support monarchy or other forms of non-democratic government; others support various types of autocracy or oligarchy; some support democracy if it can be shown that it is consistent with traditional values; others oppose all forms of government intervention in political affairs.
They believe that the way forward is not to be found in any political ideology — liberal or conservative — but rather in a return to what they see as ancient wisdom traditions which developed over thousands of years before Christianity arrived in Europe (and which existed even before Judaism and Islam).
Traditionalism has been accused of being related to several other movements within the 20th century, including far-right politics, fascism, and Nazism. However, most traditionalists adamantly reject these associations.
Meet the Traditionalists
The Traditionalist School (la scuola tradizionalista) was founded by Julius Evola (1898–1974), an Italian philosopher who rejected modernity in favor of an idealized past. He argued that there was a perennial spiritual conflict between Tradition and Modernity, and sought to restore what he saw as the virtues of ancient Greece and Rome: hierarchy, excellence, spirituality and heroism.
In his book Revolt Against The Modern World, Evola presents an extremely critical view of modernity and industrial civilization. He believed that Western civilization has been in decline since the 19th century because it had abandoned its traditional roots in favor of democracy, socialism and materialism. Evola argued that this decline could only be reversed by the development of an elite which would lead society towards an organic hierarchical order based on spiritual principles rather than liberal individualism.
Evola claimed that those people who are connected to their ancient traditions are those who are truly awake. He wrote in Revolt Against the Modern World;
“Beside the great “currents” of the world there are still individuals who are rooted in terra firma. Generally speaking, they are unknown people who shun the spotlight of modern popularity and culture.
They live on spiritual heights; they do not belong to this world. Though they are scattered over the earth and often ignorant of each other’s existence, they are united by an invisible bond and form an unbreakable chain in the traditional spirit… by virtue of these people, Tradition is present despite all; the flame burns invisibly, and something still connects the world to the superworld.
“They are those who are awake.” Evola wrote;
Evolian Traditionalism is thus a form of counter-Enlightenment philosophy, and stands in opposition to modernity, democracy and egalitarianism. It holds that the world changes in cycles: civilizations rise while others fall; humanity moves from one state of being to another. To Evola, these cycles corresponded with a natural law: what he called “metaphysics”.
According to the scholar Franco Ferraresi, he “is considered one of the most innovative and influential theorists of ‘traditionalism’—a current of thought within fascist ideology which emphasizes the need for a hierarchical social order based on natural differences.”
Next to Evola, René Guénon (1886–1951) was the most prominent figure of the traditionalist movement in twentieth-century France. He was a prolific writer whose works were influential all over the world and he also had an impact on Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam, as well as Christian theology.
Guénon developed the “Primordial Tradition”, in which he presented his works as elaborative of “traditional metaphysical principles” through his publication, “Études tradition nelles.” He wrote another important book on Traditionalism called Crisis of the Modern World (1927) where he explains how modern society is facing a crisis and how this crisis can be solved by returning to our spiritual roots. Evola wrote the introduction to the book.
In 1931 he wrote his most famous work, “The Reign of Quantity and The Signs of The Times“. This book has been translated into several languages and continues to be studied by seekers all over the world.
Guénon’s work is characterized by its uncompromising defense of traditionalism and its rigorous criticism of modernity. His writings have been described as “an unsystematic exposition of traditional doctrines”, but Guénon himself maintained that his work could be understood only within the context of the whole tradition; consequently, many of his works are often referred to as “classics”.
Guénon wrote;
“Where is the notion of a real hierarchy still to be found in the modern world?
Nothing and nobody is any longer in the right place; men no longer recognize any effective authority in the spiritual order or any legitimate power in the temporal; the ‘profane’ presume to discuss what is sacred, and to contest its character and even its existence; the inferior judges the superior, ignorance sets bounds to wisdom, error prevails over truth, the human is substituted for the Divine, earth has priority over Heaven, the individual sets the measure for all things and claims to dictate to the universe laws drawn entirely from his own relative and fallible reason.
‘Woe unto you, ye blind guides,’ the Gospel says; and indeed everywhere today one sees nothing but blind leaders of the blind, who, unless restrained by some timely check, will inevitably lead them into the abyss, there to perish with them.”
After Guénon, the next most important person was German philosopher and a founding member of the Frankfurt School, Martin Heidegger (1889-1976). His ideas have had an enormous impact on western philosophy, yet he remains one of the most difficult and controversial philosophers to read.
Although Heidegger did not claim to be or belong to any of the Traditionalist groups that Evola and Guénon had developed and was sometimes critical of Traditionalism. Although he is often described as a Traditionalist and a favorite philosopher for people such as Alexandr Dugin, because he believed that modern society had lost touch with its past and we needed to preserve it.
Heidegger said this about Traditionalism:
“There are many different kinds of traditionalism. Some people think that tradition means simply living in the past, but this is not true. Tradition only means maintaining something that has been handed down from generation to generation.”
“Tradition is not just re-enacting things from the past; it means preserving them so they can be handed down to future generations.”
One of his most important contributions to philosophy was his analysis of the concept of being and is often referred to as his “Being and Time” period. In this early period, Heidegger attempted to develop a philosophical hermeneutics that would be able to interpret all forms of human existence in view of their being in the world.
In particular, Heidegger made a distinction between two types of being: ready-to-hand (Zuhandenes), and present-at-hand (Vorhandenes). The former is an understanding of being that is based in everyday life, where things are useful to us and part of our lives; the latter is an understanding of being as something detached from our lives, which we can examine through reason alone.
This distinction has become known as Dasein-analytic or existentialism. In this kind of thinking we come to understand ourselves as human beings – in other words, we are not simply objects but subjects (what Heidegger calls Dasein). We are not simply products or objects, but subjects who have their own agency (being able to make choices).
His analysis focused on understanding being-in-the-world as being-with others (Mitsein). This approach was indebted to Martin Luther’s doctrine of justification by faith alone and Immanuel Kant’s conception of practical reason.
Heidegger also stated that human existence cannot be understood apart from its relationship with other people in the world. This relationship is always already there before us, as we find it in our everyday dealings with others. But it is not something that can be analyzed by science or philosophy, because it is always changing according to circumstances and traditions particular to each historical era.
He argued that science and technology were destroying our sense of tradition and replacing it with calculative thinking. This led to humans becoming soulless “dwellers” in technology-dominated cities who are unable to think deeply about their lives or to have meaningful experiences with other people.
Heidegger wrote;
“It is not enough to think of a tradition as a kind of intellectual property, in which we have invested our money and labor. We must also recognize that our tradition is directly responsible for our present condition, and that we are therefore obliged to it.
This obligation is what makes it possible for us to overcome the danger of becoming “strangers and sojourners” in the world.”
He famously said that “only a god can save us” from technology and industrial society (“Der Spiegel” interview 1966). His critique of modernity has been compared to that of Friedrich Nietzsche — another philosopher who was accused by some critics of being anti-Semitic — but it is also true that Nietzsche thought highly of Heidegger’s work.
Heidegger’s work remains controversial because of its association with National Socialism — he was a member of the Nazi party from 1933 until 1945 — and because of his political views after World War II.
If we are to examine this time period with the German NAZI regime, we can see that they had attempted to preserve the Traditions of their race and their so-called Arayan ancestors who were seen as biologically superior to other racial groups. Adolf Hitler promoted his ideaologies about Germany’s ancestors in his 1925 book, Mein Kampf. The think tank called The Ahnenerbe (German: [ˈʔaːnənˌʔɛʁbə], ancestral heritage) operated between 1935 and 1945 to promote their doctrines with a group of Germany’s leading scholars and scientists.
Traditionalist conservatism takes its name from the Traditionalists, a group of French intellectuals known as Les Veilleurs or “The Watchers,” who first met in 1928 at the Institut Catholique de Paris, a Jesuit-run graduate university dedicated to training priests for the Catholic priesthood.
The original members were: Charles Champetier (1890–1946), Marcel Haedrich (1892–1952), Étienne Gilson (1884–1978), Louis Massignon (1883–1955), Jean Ousset (1905–1974) and Louis Lecerf (1906–1972). They were joined later by such men as Henri de Lubac, Yves Congar and Jean Daniélou. The movement was part of a wider effort to defend the Roman Catholic Church against modernists who questioned some of its teachings.
Today, Alexander Dugin (Russian: Алекса́ндр Ге́льевич Ду́гин; born January 7, 1962) is one of the most influential and controversial Traditionalist thinkers on the world stage today. He is a Russian political scientist known for promoting a “traditionalist” worldview through his leadership of the International Eurasian Movement (Russian: Международное евразийское движение), a political party called “The Conservative Party of Russia”, and several books about geopolitics.
Dugin has been described as “Russia’s chief ideologist” by The New York Times. His work has been translated into many languages, including English, Spanish and Portuguese. He has influenced political movements from Ukraine to Brazil and Venezuela to Africa by providing them with a philosophical basis for their actions.
Dugin has expressed admiration for Julius Evola, who became an early influence on his thought and introduced him to Traditionalism; as well as for Martin Heidegar and Carl Schmitt, whose ideas on geopolitics influenced Dugin’s later works on geopolitics; and René Guénon (who Dugin calls “the master”) who introduced him to Gnosticism and Manichaeism.
He defines Traditionalism as a philosophy that “questions modernity” and advocates for a return to traditional values as “the recognition of the perennial character of human nature”. What is true, good and beautiful.
Dugin recently said;
“Traditionalism is a philosophy of life and a system of values based on the veneration of the past, particularly with regard to the preservation of what is perceived to be true, good, and beautiful.”
Dugin’s philosophy called Neo-Eurasianism or Fourth Political Theory (4PT). The 4PT is a syncretic ideology combining traditionalist ideas from Eurasian religions and European New Right with Russian nationalism and anti-liberalism. In 2006 he wrote The Fourth Political Theory, which proposed a new ideology for Russia based on traditionalism, conservatism and nationalism.
Dugin believes that Russia should be an empire like it used to be before Peter the Great. In his book The Fourth Political Theory, he argues for a postmodernist approach to politics:
“The Fourth Political Theory is thus openly opposed not only to liberalism but also to Marxism and fascism; it rejects them both as modernist ideologies that deny the uniqueness and specificity of each historical epoch.”
In 2007 he founded the Eurasia Party and in 2011 he left the party to create his own political party called Eurasian Youth Union (ESYU). The Eurasia Movement was established to promote Russian foreign policy in opposition to American hegemony. He has been described as a “key intellectual proponent” of the idea that Russia is destined to lead a new empire in place of the Soviet Union, which Dugin considers to have been usurped by Atlanticism (meaning liberalism) and globalism (meaning capitalism).
In a recent interview, Dugin speaks about the meaning of tradition and its relation to the West. He also talks about his role in Russia as a “philosopher” and what he hopes to accomplish with his work.
Question: What is your understanding of tradition?
Alexander Dugin said;
“Tradition is a complex concept. It is not just something that has existed for a long time, or that has been preserved from generation to generation. Tradition does not mean conservation of something that already exists; it means renewal and expansion of something that already exists.
Tradition is not the past but the future being born in the present,” Dugin said.
“Tradition is not a dead past but an alive future: when we look at tradition we see history being born again in us as we live our lives today. This concept is difficult for people today because they are used to living in front of their TVs or on Facebook where everything becomes “old news” within hours or minutes–or even seconds!
There’s no sense of continuity here; it’s all just fragments of information from various sources that have nothing in common except their ephemerality. We don’t live in one place anymore either; we’re constantly moving around from one place to another so there’s no sense,” he said.
While Dugin’s views are often described as fascist or neo-fascist, he rejects these labels as inaccurate and misused. In an interview with liberal Russian talk show host Ksenia Sobchak, Dugin claimed that any comparison between his views and those of Adolf Hitler was “ridiculous”.
He instead prefers to describe himself as a Traditionalist who advocates for “conservative revolution” against modernity.
Dugin recently said in an interview;
“The Traditionalists are not only a school of theology, but also a school of politics, and they have much to say about the laws of history. In particular, they believe that there is a law of cycles in history, according to which societies rise and fall according to their adherence or lack thereof to Tradition.
“The most important aspect of this Tradition is what I call the “vertical axis,” meaning the transcendent dimension of human existence. This does not mean that Traditionalists reject science or rationality — far from it! But it does mean that they think that there are levels of understanding in reality beyond our materialist vision; that is why we need both science and religion.”
In a recent interview I conducted with Alexandr Dugin on the Gnostic Warrior Podcast, he told me that this battle is not only against what he calls a Liberal Dictatorship that seeks to destroy our ancestral traditions and philosophical ideas, but for our very souls and for eternity.
He is not fighting just for the Russian Traditions, but the whole world’s Traditions.
We spoke about his 4th Political Theory and how it is the only political system right now that honors people’s traditions across cultures while bringing these issues to the political arena.
MOE: So you’re, you’re fighting for everybody’s traditions.
DUGIN: Exactly. I don’t fight only for the Russian tradition, my tradition, my church. I’m Christian. But I defend the principles that religion and tradition are not something that belongs to the past.
I argue that it belongs to eternity, but eternity is now, the past is now, and it will be tomorrow.
So that is the fight on the side of eternity, against the dictatorship or the temporality of the time of becoming. And we consider all these three models, ideology, communism, liberalism, and the French.
They are all based on a secular understanding of history. They are founded in a materialistic understanding of the world.
They don’t believe in eternity. Eternity doesn’t exist. There is only time. There is only this world. There is nothing outside of it.”
Here is my interview with Dugin.
In another article for The National Interest, Dugin is rallying the global troops of Traditionalists to join the fight against this dictatorship:
“All of us who consider ourselves traditionalists — whether religious or not — should join our efforts against the dictatorship of relativism and consumerism, against globalisation and its political instrumentality.”
I have found that a lot of what Dugin advocates for in the name of Tradition makes perfect sense. While his views at times can be considered extreme, we can also make a great case that the current Liberal Dictatoship are even more extreme to the point they seek to destroy all our Traditions – what is good, true and beautiful.
Instead, they want to indoctrinate the people and our children into their Godless Lberal religion that pisses on the past and makes up their own absurd ideologies, from changing the meaning of biology to what it means to be a man or woman and have a family by changing their genders and their identities.
So, how does a modern day Traditionalist fight against what seems to be a massive army of Liberal clones hell-bent on destroying your Traditions and indoctrinating your children into their Global Death Cult?
I will leave you with a quote by Julius Evola that accurately describes how Traditionalists battle the dregs of Modernity. Evola wrote;
“It is necessary to have “watchers” at hand who will bear witness to the values of Tradition in ever more uncompromising and firm ways, as the anti-traditional forces grow in strength. Even though these values cannot be achieved, it does not mean that they amount to mere “ideas.” These are measure.
Let people of our time talk about these things with condescension as if they were anachronistic and anti-historical; we know that this is an alibi for their defeat. Let us leave modern men to their “truths” and let us only be concerned about one thing: to keep standing amid a world of ruins,” Evola wrote. (Revolt Against the Modern World)
In other words, let the crazy Liberals keep spewing their irrational beliefs and acting like chimps. The more they do so, the easier it will be to defeat their ignorance and lies.
It is Traditionalist Watchers today, like Dugin, who believe that this is the Great Awakening and that we are in a war against Modernity. What he calls the “Serpents of Wisdom versus Serpents of Capitalism.”
It is philosophers like Dugin who are ready to defend these Traditions and, if needed, destroy Modernity into an eternal heap of ruins with Traditional ideas, and, if needed, one rocket launcher at a time.
One last final thought.
As an American, I’m on the side of Traditionalists and wish to fight for the original American ethos that honored their ancestors Traditions while also granting the people Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
This is being stolen from us all as we watch the liberals indoctrinate our children with their bad ideas and they piss on our country’s values as it all burns right before our eyes.
Dugin is right. This is a battle for eternity.
One that I believe that this will culminate into not only a world war of ideas, but the final battle for the World Soul.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
Apple is the most popular and recognizable brand in the world. Their computers and smartphone technology have both changed and taken over our lives. Today, approximately 45% of the U.S. population owns an Apple iPhone.
Almost everyone today recognizes the Apple logo. To me and other people, it looks like it represents the Biblical story of the Devil, serpent, and the apple from the Adam and Eve story.
Apple even capitalized on the story with their first advertisements, such as this one.
Hell, maybe me and my tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy friends are not so crazy after all…
But the occult references and conspiracy clues do not end there.
The original Apple I computers were hand built by Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Jobs and other friends in Wozniak’s garage with parts purchased from a local electronics store called The Byte Shop in Mountain View California (now called Fry’s Electronics) or scavenged from broken machines at their college dorms.
The first Apple 1 computer that cost about $1,533 to build, but Jobs and Wozniak decided to sell them for $666.66 each with the slogan “Byte into an Apple.”
Some people say that Jobs purposely chose the apples with a bite out of it and selling the first computers for $666.66 to honor the Mark of the Beast, and that it was Satanic because in the Bible, the Beast is identified with the number, 666.
In Revelation 13:18, it says, “This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666.”
As if Jobs and Wozniak were summoning the Devil to ritualistically assist him in this new demonic venture, and this was the machine that would do it.
Then you have Apple’s slogan, “Think Different,” which glorifies the crazy ones, misfits, rebels and trouble makers.
“Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.
About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.”
This can’t all be a coincidence, could it?
According to Steve Jobs, “Apple was so named because Jobs was coming back from an apple farm, and he was on a fruitarian diet. He thought the name was “fun, spirited and not intimidating.”
And as for the price of $666.66, Steve Wozniak says it became $666.66 because Wozniak “liked repeating digits” and because of a one-third markup on the $500 wholesale price.
Do you believe these stories or could there be something more occult going on here?
It seems to depend on who you ask.
For example, when Jean Louis Gassée, an executive at Apple Computer from 1981 to 1990, was asked about his thoughts on the Apple logo, he answered:
“One of the deep mysteries to me is our logo, the symbol of lust and knowledge, bitten into, all crossed with the colors of the rainbow in the wrong order. You couldn’t dream of a more appropriate logo: lust, knowledge, hope, and anarchy.”
When it comes to Steve Jobs character, there’s the “Good Steve,” and then, there’s the “Bad Steve,” says biographer Walter Isaacson.
In other words, he had a dark (shadow/demon) and light (enlightened/angel) side to his character.
Steve Jobs has been described as an amazingly talented leader but a highly flawed individual. He was known to be a manipulative, excitable liar who was cold, mean, and vindictive. He was not very pleasant to be around and could change moods at the drop of a dime.
While working at Atari, Jobs recruited Wozniak to help him work on the game Pong. There was a big cash bonus involved if they finished the job fast and efficiently.
They did, but Jobs lied about how much money the bonus was, pocketing the majority of the money for himself.
This was how Jobs treated people. He could give a flying f*ck about friends, co-workers and even family members like his daughter who he refused to acknowledge or support and whose mother had to live on welfare.
And even his practice of Zen Buddhism could not save the man.
Jobs lacked self-reflection skills and acted sociopathic. His capacity to deceive others, distort reality, exhibit emotional outbursts, and inflict cruelty seemed to withstand the test of time.
In my personal opinion, Steve Jobs was a talented business man but also a human piece of shit, or what some people would accurately call a sociopath, and some religious folks, a demon or the Devil incarnate himself.
Even though I do not think that he worshiped Satan or summoned demons, he was a liar, thief and terrible person – just like the so-called Devil.
His mode of being was completely individualistic or what could be called Satanic.
Hell, many CEO’s and captains of industry of this Modern world act in a similar fashion to Jobs. In fact, I believe it is more common than uncommon in the world of business.
So, it is quite fitting that Jobs, the Beast of Apple Computers, had decided to sell their first computer for $666.66.
Remember, “This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666.” – Revelation 13:18
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
