by Moe | Aug 28, 2021 | Freemasonry, History of the Brotherhood, Political Metaphysics, Traditionalism
“I am present at the sowing of the seed of the world.” – Ralph Waldo Emmerson
During his Harvard commencement speech in 1837, Ralph Waldo Emmerson (May 25, 1803 – April 27, 1882) took the podium to address the top students in the graduating class marking the capstone in a week of ceremony and tradition. In his speech, titled “The American Scholar,” Emerson commanded that our young country must develop a national intellectual life distinct from the colonial influences of the past. He condemned the academic scholarship of the time for its reliance on historical and institutional wisdom.
Emmerson argued that the scholar had become “decent, indolent, complaisant.” To become more than “a mere thinker, or, still worse, the parrot of other men’s thinking,” a scholar must begin to engage with the world for oneself.
Emmerson is a famous American author and poet who grew up in Concord, Massachusetts, famously known as the home of both Minutemen and Transcendentalists. A place where “embattled farmers” fired “the shot heard ’round the world,” starting the war for political independence on the 19th of April 1775. The place where I contend that the traditional landscape of Freemasonry and philosophy were officially changed to what was we see today in the West.
Emmerson’s “The American Scholar” would give a new voice to the movement’s individualism: envisioning an independent American intellectual culture premised not on any kind of nationalist pride—nor any particular doctrine or political system—but on a dedication to independence itself. He would later define the “American idea” he sought to promote through his work simply as “Emancipation.”
Emerson’s speech left a particular impression on two members of the Harvard community, a troublemaking undergraduate named James Russell Lowell and a recent alumnus named Oliver Wendell Holmes.
“The Puritan revolt had made us ecclesiastically and the Revolution politically independent, but we were still socially and intellectually moored to English thought,” Lowell later wrote, “till Emerson cut the cable and gave us a chance at the dangers and the glories of blue water.”
Holmes called the speech America’s “intellectual Declaration of Independence.”
The world-famous Freemason and author Emmerson first preached the doctrine of “self-reliance” and Transcendental individualism, which directly conflicted with the tenets of Masonic fraternalism. After all, Freemasonry follows an ancient tradition reaching back to Ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, and King Solomon’s Temple. Masons are expected to absorb these lessons dictated by our tradition and authority because, since ancient times, local lodges were governed by rules and constitutions tightly regulating the conduct of individuals.
However, Transcendentalists Freemasons like Emmerson urged Americans to free themselves from the dead hand of the past. As Emerson directed in his essay “Nature,” the transcendentalists sought freedom from the “poetry and philosophy of … tradition” and “religion by … history.”
This is where the idea of how to live much more liberally and do not honor our ancient traditions is sown like a seed by Emmerson into the American mind and Freemasonry. The Ancient Charge from the Records of Lodges of FreeMasons had stated their precepts emphatically, “A Mason is obliged by his Tenure, to obey the moral Law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist nor an irreligious Libertine.”
Masonic historian and 33rd Degree Freemason Albert Mckay had written that a stupid Atheist is, “the fool who has said in his heart there is no God,” while an “irreligious libertine” designated “the man who, with a degree, less of unbelief, denies the distinctive doctrines of revealed religion.” McKay says that “a stupid Atheist” denoted, to use the language of the Psalmist, “the fool who has said in his heart there is no God,” while an “irreligious libertine” designated the man who, with a degree less of unbelief denies the distinctive doctrines of revealed religion. (Mackey’s Encyclopedia of Freemasonry)
I contend that Emerson’s ideas were also not in line with the original American Founders who believed in progress, enlightenment, and “a new order of the ages” but they also honored the ancient Greek and Roman traditions, philosophies of the religious basis of morals, and common law. Most of the Founders also came from conservative and orthodox (or “right-believing”) Christian religious traditions. For example, in the cases of John Jay, George Washington, Edward Rutledge, John Adams, Samuel Adams, Charles Carroll, and Daniel Carroll, and Thomas Fitzsimmons.
They were all baptized, listed on church rolls, and married to practicing Christians. In public statements, they invoked divine assistance. Many of them were Freemasons.
Robert P. Kraynak, professor of political science at Colgate University in Hamilton, New York, describes them as “enlightened traditionalists. Kraynak writes;
“The American Founders were unusual as eighteenth-century leaders because they were shaped by both the old world of aristocracy and the new world of democracy. They believed in progress, enlightenment, and “a new order of the ages”; but they also revered the ancient Romans, English traditions of the gentleman statesman and common law, the religious basis of morals, and practical experience.”
Kraynak stated, “The fourth element, cultural traditions, extends the idea of moral order to social practices. The American Founders believed that liberty required natural law (an objective standard of justice) and customs, habits, and manners derived from the heritage of Western civilization and English and American history.
I use the phrase “cultural traditions” as a catch-all phrase to refer to the values and beliefs handed down over centuries from several ancient sources—from classical Greek and Roman ideals of republican virtue and patriotic citizen-soldiers; from the English heritage of common law jurisprudence; from the ideal of gentlemen statesmen (possessing the gentleman’s code of honor); from Protestant Christianity and its biblical beliefs about America as a “city on a hill” charged with moral duties, such as the work ethic, the struggle against sin, and charity for the poor; and from the historical experience of local self-government in colonial assemblies and the harsh self-reliance of frontier life.
The implication is that liberty was embedded in cultural traditions that gave it higher and nobler purposes than mere self-expression or the values of a consumer-entertainment society. The American Founders assumed that such customs and traditions would provide a set of moral virtues for the exercise of responsible liberty by citizens and leaders.”
As you can see, Emerson’s demands that people free themselves from the dead hand of the past is not at all in line with the original ethos of the American founders. However, his ideas and influence would spread around America and the world.
Emmerson had many connections through his family and his Masonic membership. He was a member of the Corinthian Lodge, which played an essential role in starting the liberal revolution. He lectured there for many years, finding a very influential audience for his ideas. Quickly, his liberalist doctrines infected other people, lodges, and eventually, I contend, changing the very laws in our court systems to be pro-liberal.
Tracing the lineage from Traditional Freemasonry to Liberal Masonry is crucial to documenting the change. As the Masonic scholar, Robert A. Gross from the University of Connecticut writes;
“Well over 150 men passed through the Corinthian Lodge between 1797 and 1832; spiritual rebels like Thoreau can be counted on two hands. But, even more to the point, Freemasonry was the faith of the Transcendentalists’ fathers. The Rev. Ezra Ripley, member of both the Corinthian Lodge and the Royal Chapter and forceful defender of the fraternity in its time of woe, was the step-grandfather of Emerson.
His generational counterpart was the erstwhile minister and clergyman Asa Dunbar, the maternal grandfather of Thoreau. Tracing the lineage from Freemason to Transcendentalist is indeed as crucial to our intellectual history as following the path from Jonathan Edwards to Ralph Waldo Emerson.”
Emmerson was not only well connected in the states, but he also had some serious connections all over the world. In 1826, faced with poor health, Emerson moved to a warmer client in St. Augustine, Florida, where he took long walks on the beach and began writing poetry.
While in St. Augustine, he made the acquaintance of Prince Achille Murat, the nephew of the former French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, who had renounced his European titles (after his father had already been overthrown) and immigrated to the United States. Murat was also a writer, and the two young men reportedly discussed religion, politics, and philosophy.
In 1833, Emerson turned his love of writing into a career as a frequent lecturer. He traveled around New England, reading his essays and speaking to audiences about his views on nature, the role of religion, and his travels. In 1838, Emerson was invited to Divinity Hall, Harvard Divinity School, to deliver the school’s graduation address, which came to be known as the “Divinity School Address“.
Emerson discounted biblical miracles and proclaimed that, while Jesus was a great man, he was not God: historical Christianity, he said, had turned Jesus into a “demigod, as the Orientals or the Greeks would describe Osiris or Apollo”.
His comments outraged the establishment and the general Protestant community. He was denounced as an atheist and a poisoner of young men’s minds. Despite the roar of critics, he made no reply, leaving others to put forward a defense. He was not invited back to speak at Harvard for another thirty years.
In 1841 Emerson published Essays, his second book, which included the famous essay “Self-Reliance.” His aunt called it a “strange medley of atheism and false independence,” but it gained favorable reviews in London and Paris. More than any of Emerson’s contributions to date, this book, and its popular reception laid the groundwork for his international fame.
At the time, Emerson made a left turn from his contemporaries’ religious and social beliefs, formulating and expressing the philosophy of transcendentalism in his 1836 essay “Nature“. In 1837, he detailed this new doctrine in a speech entitled “The American Scholar“, which Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. considered to be America’s “intellectual Declaration of Independence.”
Emerson’s family was well connected to other Liberal transcendentalists such as the family of Henry James Sr. and one of the most famous liberal justices to ever to sit in the U.S. Supreme Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, who was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and was generally associated with the liberal wing of the Court on most issues as I will discuss in the next chapter.
Holmes once said that he wanted to be a man of letters like Emerson. While he was a student at Harvard, he had written various papers on philosophy and even an attack on Plato’s idealist philosophy, which he asked Emerson to read. Emerson famously replied, “If you strike at a king, you must kill him.”
In the following decades, until the modern-day, Freemasonry would suffer significantly for abandoning its founding principles based on Ancient Traditions for a more liberal and Transcendentalist Masonry. Rather than honoring tradition, following the idea of Emerson’s famous saying, “an institution” is not merely “the lengthened shadow of one man.”
No longer is a Masonic initiate subject to an extreme examination of his character by a special committee. Once admitted to a lodge, the Mason remained subject to collective discipline for immoral or criminal conduct. It was not about individualism but shared beliefs creating mutual bonds and loyalties to a more significant cause.
The new ethos was of a piece with the individualistic world of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau.
Emerson was a well-paid and famous lecturer touring locations across the northern United States and in Canada. He was delivering up to 70-80 lectures a year in his prime, attracting the attention of Herman Melville, who attended his speaking engagements in New York City. In addition, he would go on walks with Nathaniel Hawthorne and captured the attention of leading theologian and intellectual Henry James Sr., father to William and Henry.
Many authors like Wallace Stevens and Robert Frost embraced and incorporated Emerson’s ideas furthering their spread.
In May 1857, he met at the Parker House Hotel in Boston with Francis Henry Underwood, Oliver Holmes Sr., and the poet and fellow Freemason, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Together they founded a magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, which was dedicated to advocating abolitionism and promoting new American ideas and voices.
In their words, they sought to advance American writing and the “American idea” “wherever the English tongue is spoken or read”—a reflection of Emerson’s desire for a national intellectual identity that could transcend the country’s institutions and borders.
In this year 2021, we can say they succeeded in spreading their Neo-Liberal ideas globally through their influence, media, and Freemasonry.
Emerson’s seed he had sown in the world well over 100 years ago is now a mighty oak tree.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Jul 17, 2021 | Free Will, Mind Control Research, Traditionalism
Scientists have recently discovered that humans are part of the earth’s magnetic biosphere, which is now called “human magnetoreception.”
A number of recent studies have reported the magnetism in carbon, mostly in Russian and Japanese scientific literature, and in 2007, carbon officially made the list of magnetic elements when researchers published a paper finally putting to rest doubts about carbon’s magnetic abilities.
The researchers in this study discovered that not only does carbon become magnetized with a little doctoring, but the behavior also comes naturally with no special treatment required via a carbon-based material on its surface called graphite.
The paper’s lead author and staff scientist at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) at SLAC, Hendrik Ohldag had said at the time of the discovery;
“In the past, some groups thought they had discovered magnetic carbon. Unfortunately, they realized later that they were misled by small amounts of iron, cobalt, or nickel in their samples, Ohldag said.
According to Ohldag, magnetism is an “ordering phenomenon.”
This natural ordering phenomenon that Ohldag speaks of is how I contend the science of ORDO AB CHAO in creating human organizations and societies.
Ohldag said this is caused by the spin of the electrons within the magnets and when they align, a magnetic field is produced.
All atoms behave like tiny magnets because of the spin orientation of electrons, he says. When enough of those tiny magnetic spins, or “moments,” align, the material emanates a measurable magnetic field. The electron spins of iron align readily, even at high temperatures, making it an ideal magnetic material.”
“With carbon, we know how to make things very small,” Ohldag added. “On the other hand, we know a lot about how to process and store information using magnetism. This opens up the door for future studies that will lead to improved magnetism in carbon, which could one day lead to combining the ‘magnetic’ and the ‘carbon’ world.”
Carbon is a primary element of all known life on Earth, representing approximately 45–50% of all dry biomass. As I explained in my article, The Science of 666, humans are known as carbon-based life forms and Carbon is Element 6 on the Periodic Table of Elements or more appropriately, 666. It consists of 6 Neutrons, 6 Protons, and 6 Electrons and is the world’s most important structural element, and about 12 percent of your body’s atoms are carbon.
According to the Swinburne Center for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, as the sixth-most abundant element in the universe, carbon forms in the belly of stars in a reaction called the triple-alpha process.
The triple–α process is extremely important in determining the elemental composition of the universe and allowing life as we know it to exist and what I contend is how our work is ordered.
Yet that the process occurs at all is somewhat improbable, as its discoveries showed it was only made possible by the complex interplay of physical constants that cause the excited resonance of C-12 to occur where it does. The philosophical and scientific implications of this have prompted much discussion.
It is the triple-alpha process, the belly (second brain), and the brain where I hypothesize that ORDO AB CHAO is formed in human societies because it is extremely important in determining the elemental composition (order) of the whole universe and allowing all life on earth as we know it to exist.
This process I theorize is explained in quantum mechanics as the intrinsic angular momentum or “spin” of electrons, which can have only one of two values; “up or down”.
It is this spin of electrons that produces an electric field and in doing so, a magnetic field is produced. As we now know, humans are like magnets and that would mean that we are subject to the same laws of the universe and biomagnetic fields of the earth in which we live.
We are also like a radio with an antenna, i.e. the brain in our skulls and the second brain in our bowels (gi tracts) that can receive outside communication signals to control various thought processes. This is where I believe the natural ordering or hierarchy of human society from the peasant to the philosopher and also how the World Soul or what is called the Noosphere is naturally formed.
We know that magnetism results from the circular motion of charged particles that spin up or down. Depending on your mode of thinking, I contend human bodies and minds act as electrons do by either spinning up or spinning down in quantum mechanics and I have the research to back up my theory, and here is how it all works.
Some people spin up (clockwise), and some spin down (counter-clockwise) or not at all net zero.
To spin up is for the human to be engaged in being as to move and to create a charge, energy, light, or nous that permeates everything around you which can be figuratively represented by Vitruvian man and the upright pentagram. This is the true state of being and personhood. This energy would then participate and be part of what the Ancient Greeks had called the World Soul and later dubbed the Noosphere.
To spin up would be the Christian concept of illumination or enlightenment resulting from being Baptized by the Heavenly Fire, also known as the Light, Holy Fire, and Spirit. To be saved and born again into the Light.
This is why Jesus had proclaimed; “I am come to send fire on the earth. The fire which He came to send is the fire of judgment which shall burn up the chaff (see Note on Matthew 3:12), the baptism of fire can purify and cleanse as well as destroy.
In Gnosticism, this concept would be told in the story of who we know as the First Gnostic, Simon Magus speaking of the Boundless Power (ie: Infinite Power or Fire) he possessed proclaimed, “He who has stood, stands and will stand.” For this reason, it was said that he had called himself the “Standing One.”
I believe that the Christian concept of illumination or enlightenment or what Simon called the Boundless Power is a human magnetoreception phenomenon that today can actually be measured via our brain’s alpha waves.
For example, a study by CalTech titled “Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from Alpha-band Activity in the Human Brain” had shown that changes in alpha wave amplitude occur when the brain is being engaged as spinning clockwise or is in a resting or “autopilot” mode making it spin counterclockwise while following rotations of an Earth-strength magnetic field.
The researchers stated that when a human brain is unengaged, the alpha power is high.
According to Caltech, “the image above shows the changes in alpha wave amplitude—a measure of whether the brain is being engaged or is in a resting or “autopilot” mode—following rotations of an Earth-strength magnetic field. On the left, counterclockwise rotations induce a widespread drop in alpha wave amplitude. (The darker the blue color, the more dramatic the drop.) No drop is observed after clockwise rotation or in the FIXED condition.” (Credit: Connie X. Wang / Caltech)
This is the science I speak of. When the brain is engaged, it spins clockwise, and when it is resting or autopilot mode (Beast, Automaton, Therion, Behimah, Zombie, Sheople), it follows the rotations of the earth’s magnetic field.
The study was led by geoscientist Joseph Kirschvink and neuroscientist Shin Shimojo at Caltech as well as a neuroengineer Ayu Matani at the University of Tokyo. Kirschvink said in a press release;
“Aristotle described the five basic senses as including vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch. However, he did not consider gravity, temperature, pain, balance, and several other internal stimuli that we now know are part of the human nervous system. Our animal ancestry argues that geomagnetic field sensors should also be there representing not the sixth sense but perhaps the 10th or 11th human sense to be discovered.”
According to CalTech;
“The tests further revealed that the brain appears to be actively processing magnetic information and rejecting signals that are not “natural.” For example, when the vertical component of the magnetic field pointed steadily upward during the experiments, there were no corresponding changes in brain waves. Because the magnetic field normally points down in the Northern Hemisphere, it seems that the brain is ignoring signals that are obviously “wrong.” This component of the study could be verified by replicating the experiment in the Southern Hemisphere, Kirschvink suggests, where the opposite pattern should hold.
“Alpha-ERD is a strong neural signature of sensory detection and the resulting attention shift. The fact that we see it in response to simple magnetic rotations like we experience when turning or shaking our head is powerful evidence for human magnetoreception. The large individual differences we found are also intriguing with regard to human evolution and the influences of modern life,” says Shimojo. “As for the next step, we ought to try bringing this into conscious awareness.”
Here is a great explanation of how this works spin-polarized and spin-unpolarized electrons and how I believe our societies are formed in similar patterns of order or disorder.
All conduction electrons in an electron gas can be divided into two groups of spin-polarized and spin-unpolarized electrons. The total spin of electrons of the group of spin-unpolarized electrons is zero. The spin directions of electrons of the group of spin-unpolarized electrons are equally distributed in all directions.
All spins of electrons of the group of the spin-polarized electrons are in the same direction. The total spin of this group is non-zero.
The properties of electrons in the groups of spin-polarized and spin-unpolarized electrons are different: (1) energy distributions are different (2) the transport properties are different. For example, the electrical conductivities for groups of spin-polarized and spin-unpolarized electrons are different. Because of this difference the electrical conductivity becomes spin-dependent (the magneto-resistance effect).
Spin-unpolarized electrons create chaos.
The spin directions are equally distributed in all directions.
The total spin of this group is zero.
The time-inverse symmetry is not broken for this group.
As this science is related to magnetism, when something catches its attention or we can simply say when the brain’s attention is magnetized by an outside force such as a person, the TV, or computer, consciously or unconsciously, its alpha power drops. Several other sensory stimuli like vision, hearing, and touch are known to cause abrupt drops in the amplitude of alpha waves in the first few seconds after the stimulus.
They become unpolarized.
These magnetic particles when the brain is engaged become part of what science calls the electron atmosphere. The magnetic field lines are created by the movement of these charges that are absorbed by the electron nucleus and then ejected in a cycle of vortex movement that is explained in this schema cycle.
The brain becomes polarized. It now receives ideas and participates in the noosphere with its own ideas.
I contend that humans and our cultures throughout history are also part of this same magnetic process, which is part of Natural Law or the Laws of Nature.
Just like the earth, our alpha brain waves create magnetically charged tiny particles that form the magnetic field lines of which contribute to the World Soul/Noosphere. The As Within and So Below consciousness of humans via their nous (minds) creates the As Above Global Mind or Noosphere via ideas and thoughts.
According to Plato, we live in an orderly universe created by forms, predominantly the Form of the Good, which he describes as “the brightest region of Being.” The Form of the Good is the cause of all things, and when it is seen it leads a person to act wisely. In the Republic, the ideal community is “a city which would be established in accordance with nature.”
I believe we absorb or accept ideas becoming part of our Traditions and Philosophies i.e. electron atmosphere (World Soul, Global Mind, or Noosphere) that appear to have immortal life cycles. These ideas become part of our lives and histories by the amount of attention, energy, and life we give to these ideas which create order in various cultures.
You see, carbon is a massive worldwide pattern maker that can link to itself, forming long, resilient chains called polymers. It can also bond with up to four other atoms because of its electron arrangement. This would align with the Fraternal bonds of Brotherhood based not on race, tribe, or religion, but Fraternity.
For example, Pythagoras brought us the ideas that led to Pythagoreanism and the magnetic chain of minds and his followers would be known as the Pythagoreans. Later, Plato brought us Platonism and the magnetic chain of Platonists. Of course, there were many good souls of all races and cultures who added their own electrons via ideas to these concepts and philosophies that have been naturally magnetized to the same ideas creating the World Soul or Noosphere.
Not by force or by unnatural means of black magic mesmerism but by the simple power and truth of these same ideas and concepts.
Hence, we can say that Order is created by God’s natural laws and ideas, not by human laws.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Jul 13, 2021 | Free Will, Mind Control Research, Traditionalism
“Destruction, sin, evil, in short, is all My sphere, the element I most prefer.” Mephistopheles
There is an ancient war on this earth that has been happening since the beginning of time. This battle has been fought by every man, woman, and child regardless of their race, gender, or country.
This conflict first originated within humankind’s mind and body and has played out upon the landscapes we now dwell in.
I speak of the age-old struggle for the dominion of the universal mind or what has been called the “Noosphere.”
The philosophical concept of the Noosphere was first developed in the early 20th century by the Russian mineralogist and geochemist Vladimir Vernadsky, and the French philosopher and Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
Noosphere is from the Greek νόος (“mind”, “reason”) and σφαῖρα (“sphere”).
Vernadsky described it as the next and highest stage of the biosphere’s development. It is a crucial factor in the evolution of humankind’s “rational activities” where the emergence of reason would be a powerful, even geological force tied to the development of science and scientific thinking.
He mostly viewed the Noosphere as a “sphere of reason,” the “realm of reason,” the “reign of reason,” and even “life’s domain ruled by reason” because being an atheist, he believed that science is grounded in truth as having the most vital universal binding force.
Like Vedansky, the Teilhard thought of the Noosphere is the sphere of thought encircling the earth that has emerged through evolution due to human consciousness. However, being a man of God, his vision was more spiritual than that of Verdansky’s.
Teilhard had stated that forces of the mind have been creating and deploying pieces of the Noosphere for ages. Now, it is finally achieving a global presence, and its varied “compartments” are fusing. Before long, a synthesis will occur. People of different nations, races, and cultures will develop consciousness and mental activity that are planetary in scope without “losing their identities.”
According to the RAND Corporation’s research paper ‘Whose Story Wins,” this Noos is a physical thinking layer;
Over the past century, various scientists in Europe, the United States, and Russia have developed a stream of thinking about the geosphere, biosphere, and Noosphere. Whether appearing singly or jointly, these three terms should be viewed as a set for understanding earth’s evolution as a planet. First to evolve was a globe-circling geosphere consisting of a geological mantle.
Next was a globe-circling physical layer, or biosphere, consisting of plant and animal life. Third, growing and developing will be a globe-circling realm of the mind, a “thinking layer” termed the Noosphere. These concepts were all in use by the 1920s, and they continue to spread today.”
Over time, I contend that these connections of Noos, AKA the mind create a physical sphere of influence that then develops into our human social order or rank. Humans who are genuinely “conscious beings” have given us philosophy, science, and the very human laws of living within the planetary Noos forming the theology of our world religions. These men and women become conduits of knowledge and reason and are held up as eternal lights to humanity.
This is why these people make the history books while the vast majority of humanity is forgotten. This rank of the mind has been followed since the beginning of human history.
For example, we can examine the various sciences and institutions in modern times that have been developed around them to find that they now can be found in almost every civilized country around the world. These scientists research and “create studies” that become the framework of a global database where this knowledge is available to other scientists to connect to and expand upon.
This research and ideas can influence other “scientific minds” to become a “network of minds” connected to one another by nothing but knowledge, ideas, and the scientific reasoning explaining them.
We can say that the Noosphere is “the sphere or planet of the mind of reason,” and we conscious beings are interconnected via the light that permeated the different hyphae (channels/website) of the internet or the Noospherenet.
When used in relation to the definition of Verdansky and Teilhard, the word sphere can be defined as any zone, layer or region enveloping or radiating from the earth or another celestial body. The Noos or mind would be the area or range over or within which the human being with his or her truths acts, exists, or has influence or significance over the world, thus influencing other beings with his Noos, thus forming a formal connection.
Therefore, it is an actual physical thing that is a part of nature, like the atmosphere and biosphere.
Today, we can say that the Noosphere has been actualized by the invention and development of the internet, AKA the world wide web or what we can call the “world public sphere.” I believe a physical sphere of mind is exactly the framework that Verdansky and Teilhard had described, but today it is not quite entirely what they had envisioned.
According to Teilhard, fully realized, the Noosphere will raise humankind to a high, new evolutionary plane, one driven by collective coordination of psychosocial and spiritual energies and by a devotion to moral and juridical principles. However, he warned, the transition may not be smooth; a global tremor and possibly an apocalypse may characterize the final fusion of the Noosphere (1964, pp. 175–181; 1965, pp. 287–290).
By this, what many philosophers fail to consider when describing the Noosphere is that human beings often behave, think, and act differently from one another, and how they use their minds differs significantly from one person to the next. I contend that these differences are primarily born within a person’s being concerning if they are, in fact, truly knowledgeable, independently thinking, and understanding individuals.
This is the Final War of Ideas: The Battle of the Neurosphere for the Noosphere.
A world where humans are not shaped by the designs we create, but by the interior design of our genetic and mental makeup, who we truly are on the inside creates the world on the so without. I contend that the world is governed by two forces or two minds at our current stage of human development, and the one who wins our central nervous systems will gain control of the internet or what we can now call the Noospherenet and reign supreme over the global Noosphere.
These two minds would be the Noos Verdansky and Teilhard had envisioned and the other the false noos (little mind or Metatron), or what we can call the Koiliasphere or Stomasphere, which operate currently in opposition with one another. One mind would like to build God’s kingdom upon earth where humans can acquire knowledge and the theological laws to live as sovereign beings.
The other is the false mind of what theologians might call the Devil that would like to keep us ignorant so that we can destroy ourselves and the world with it. Thus we remain a constant food source for his Legion of Demons or in modern lore, vampires and zombies disguised as humans.
People who often walk and talk just like us, but in scientific reality, their central nervous systems have been hijacked by fungal parasites within the gi tracts. Microorganisms are pulling the levers of their being that cause them to become unconscious automatons hell-bent on their own and everyone else’s destruction while appearing on the surface to be selfless and caring. You will know them by their lack of original thoughts, sins, and sheep-like or should we say, “mold-like” behavior.
Their thoughts, ideas, and words are not their own. They have been copied, regurgitated, and repackaged. That is just what they do. They know no better because they do not control their minds.
Before we knew of the word ontology, Aristotle had called it by the name “first philosophy” and defines it as the discipline that studies “being as being.”
Later in the 17th century, the German philosopher Jacob Lorhard had invented the Latin term ontologia as the “science of being” with his concepts dealing with the soul, bodies, or God. Over time, the various disciplines and ideas of ontological thought and often fierce debates would expand based on the particular philosopher’s chosen field and influence. Still, the basic tenants have remained the same since the days of Aristotle and Erhard.
Ontology is the study of the human being, based on a set of scientific concepts and categories such as philosophy, biology, math, theology, and metaphysics that show their properties and the relations between them.
According to Stanford, the more considerable discipline of ontology can thus be described as having four parts:
1. the study of ontological commitment, i.e. what we or others are committed to
2. the study of what there is
3. the study of the most general features of what there is, and how the things there are related to each other in the metaphysically most general ways
4. the study of meta-ontology, i.e., saying what task it is that the discipline of ontology should aim to accomplish, if any, how the questions it aims to answer should be understood, and with what methodology they can be answered
For example, my main branch of philosophical studies seeks to answer questions 1-3, such as “How humans interact with the microorganisms such as fungi that inhabit their bodies, minds, and environments and how the manner of being/how we live or our consciousness can be affected by our relations with them.”
With that said, my primary ontological studies seek to answer “what are humans and true reality made of and what the relations and influence of these things are?”
To answer these questions, I first studied biology to find out then that the human body contains trillions of microorganisms, which, all together, are called the human microbiota — outnumbering human cells by 10 to 1. As this relates to ontology, my study is how humans interact and how the nature of being human and consciousness is affected by these millions of tiny living organisms. Microorganisms that can be found in every drop of blood, all over our skin, in the nose, mouth, and especially in the human gastrointestinal tracts (gi tract/gut/stomach), which science has determined is our second brain.
Scientific interest in the gut-brain axis has gained tremendous interest, primarily due to identifying the gut microbiome as a novel key player in this communication. The gut-brain axis is defined as “a bidirectional link between the central nervous system (CNS) and the enteric nervous system (ENS) of the body. It involves direct and indirect pathways between cognitive and emotional centers in the brain with peripheral intestinal functions.”
Here is an illustration of this communication that I believe describes via the pyramid structures where the “false noos” would communicate from the bottom-up pathway, and the brain acts as a mediator or central processor for these communications.
I would like to point out that this diagram is how each mind has different functions and appears to be opposed to one another in their goals.
For example, the lower mind represented by the upright pyramid is more concerned about the individual and self-identity as our bodies, genetics, and personal histories. On the other hand, the higher mind (inverted pyramid) is more concerned with the outside world, such as the environment and social issues that concern their culture and or community.
I contend that a person who mainly operates from their lower mind is more selfish, materialistic, and most likely, more liberal. A person who primarily works from their higher mind would be more inclined to use their mind for mainly selfless activities like issues that concern their communities and cultures. They would be more socially oriented to careers serving others like a teacher, doctor, and or government employee.
When there is an imbalance of the higher and lower minds or the gut microbiome becomes parasitic as the result of poor health choices, it causes mental disorders that are telltale signs that the battle is reaching its end stages for the lower mind’s final dominion of the human vehicle.
Scientists have discovered that gut microbiome imbalance, stress, and its subsequent effects on the brain may lead to several mental disorders such as schizophrenia.
Here is a little more information about the gut-brain access and its influence upon our brain from Nuerohacker;
- The gut is our largest body surface, 100 times larger than the surface area of the skin;
- The gut has more neurons than the entire spinal cord;
- The gut contains around 80% of the body’s immune cells;
- The endocrine (i.e. hormone-producing) cells in the intestinal wall make the gut the largest endocrine organ of the body;
- The gut interacts with and receives signals from the largest microbial population of our body, about 38 trillion microbes reside in the gut and are collectively known as the gut microbiota.
The brain needs to keep tabs on the gut because there is a very complex set of environmental, neuronal, immune, hormonal, and microbial interactions taking place there. Through the brain-gut axis, the brain can monitor and regulate these interactions and respond to changes in the composition of the microbiota due to infections, antibiotics, or diet, for example.
More surprisingly, through the gut-brain axis, microbes can influence brain function, mood, and behavior.”
Humans are controlled by either the brain in their guts or the brain within their heads, which both can be considered the “false noos.” A false noos that through the gut-brain axis, many people are controlled by the microbes in the gut, giving them carte blanch access to their lives and, ultimately, their destruction to become food for the same microorganisms.
An extreme example of microbes controlling people’s minds I detail in my article, “Meth Demons: How methamphetamine addicts develop parasitic fungal infections.” In the article, I discuss how researchers have found that METH causes significant neurotoxicities to arise, increasing the risk of acquiring infectious microbes and other opportunistic infections such as systemic fungal infections. In addition, researchers found that fungi/molds like Candida overgrowths or infections in the digestive tract may disrupt the gut-brain axis and may also play a role in affecting the memory of women with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
One, I would like to call “Interior Ontological Design”, where the world and humans are not shaped by the designs we create, but by the interior design of genetic and mental makeup where who we truly are on the inside makes the world on the so without. I contend with my “Interior Ontological Design” that the world is governed by two forces or two minds at our current stage of human development.
These two minds would be the Noos that Verdansky and Teilhard had envisioned and the other the false Noos, or what I would like to call the Koiliasphere, Greek for the sphere of the stomach, which operates currently in opposition with the Noosphere.
When a person is fully conscious and healthy, we get what we call an “authentic or original being” who manages and controls both the brains in their heads and their gi tracts. They become masters of the gut-brain access and their Noosphere rather than slaves to the false noos i.e.: the microbes that truly control his mind.
When a human is in control of his Noosphere, AKA their mind and bodies, by default, they connect to other humans in this same sphere of light and truth by the very words, ideas, and philosophies that are interconnected with one another as if originating from the same source – “true Noos.” A Noos where humans originate and permeate the higher ideals contained within its philosophical, theological, and laws of “being human” have been passed down through our religious and philosophical traditions.
Hence, we can say that these are genuinely conscious and sovereign humans who can communicate and understand the global Noosphere, as Dr. Nicolas Laos delineates in his book, “The Meaning of Being Illuminati.”
In other words, they have mastered the very organisms that inhabit their bodies and defeated the Black Maji who seeks to keep them devolved ie: enslaved in the false noos to participate in the Great Work of educating their fellow humans into being – saving one soul at a time.
These ontological facts are common to every human and every mode of being. I have also found that the quality or state of having an existence and our quality of life in our Western culture depends largely upon the health of our gastrointestinal tracts,
The word being is essential when understanding the basis for my thesis for the Ontological Interior Design of Humanit when used in conjunction with humans; it means the “nature or essence of a person” or what can be called the soul, Spirit, essence, and even entity of a person.
Many of us live a separate and distinct existence where our objective concepts of reality can create philosophies and ideas of how the world works that can be diametrically opposed to one another. It is these philosophies and ideas that I theorize we can examine for their authenticity and or who they may have originated from that we can safely analyze to determine what “spirit or entity” is truly in charge of how and if we truly think, live, eat and act as autonomous or controlled beings.
The being, Spirit, or even entity, I contend, is not the same for every living person.
For example, in Christian theology, the two spirits are identified as the Holy Spirit emanating from God, and the other is the Satanic or Demonic Spirit. The people controlled by the Holy Spirit have their minds upon God, and the Satanic Spirit is only concerned only with human affairs.
As it is said in Matthew 16:23; “Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”
To have merely human concerns is to follow the false noos.
The Gnostic concept of these two different spirits can be found within the Apocryphon of John describes the fate of human souls dependent upon which Spirit or Spirit controls their minds and bodies. If you tended to be a good or a bad person (mask), would determine which “spirit was in possession” of your soul, for it was your words and actions that would uncover (Apocalypto) your superficial mask to reveal your true nature.
One Spirit is the “Spirit of Life” and is described as “the Holy Spirit who is called Life, the mother of everyone {except the holy Spirit who is called the Mother of all the living}. The Spirit that is good and where our angelic qualities and or Godly natures come from. This is where our true soul is born – the essence of light or what Christians once called the “Holy Fire” and today is known universally in Christianity as the “Holy Spirit”.
The other one is bad, and this is where all sin and evil are derived. It is called the “Counterfeit spirit“.
The ancient Gnostics had said that the Archons with their leader Idalbaoth had sent to the descendants of Adam and Eve (You and I) a “counterfeit spirit (Counterfeit Daemon) which enters the souls, overgrows, hardens, closes them, weights them down, leads them astray to works of evil, and thus makes them impotent to know (gnosis).”
In Goethe’s Faust, the two spirits are represented as God, the “great splendid Spirit” and Mephistopheles, who was “the spirit of perpetual negation” who controls what we may call the “sphere of evil and sin – aka human destruction.”
Faust contrasts the two spirits or entities as God, the “great splendid Spirit… who know[s] my heart and my soul,” with Mephistopheles, “this vile companion” bent on ruin and destruction.
Mephistopheles identifies the “sphere of mind” that he manipulates and controls when he says;
“Destruction, sin, evil, in short, is all My sphere, the element I most prefer.” (1343-1344)
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
by Moe | Feb 26, 2021 | Neoliberalism, Traditionalism
America’s modern brand of neoliberalism faces serious backlash from France, which has recently declared war on American ideas that “corrupt society.” President Emmanuel Macron and many of his top officials have spoken out against the extreme liberal ideas originating from American campuses in recent months and accuse left-leaning intellectuals of justifying Islamism and terrorism.
The French government announced this week that it would be investigating its universities looking into academic research and people who are pushing social sciences from American universities and contribute to undermining French society such as “Islamo-leftist” tendencies.
This news is not surprising because Islamist terrorists have killed more than 250 French people over the last few years, including the beheading of school teacher Samuel Paty who showed students in a civics class caricatures of the prophet, and in recent months three people who were at a Church basilica in Nice.
Frances minister of higher education, Frédérique Vidal, said this week that the state-run National Center for Scientific Research would manage the investigation into the “totality of research underway in our country,” singling out post-colonialism.
In a previous interview, Ms. Vidal stated that the investigation would focus on “Islamo-leftism” — a controversial term embraced by some of Mr. Macron’s leading ministers to
“Islamo-leftism corrupts all of society and universities are not impervious,” Ms. Vidal said, adding that some scholars were advancing “radical” and “activist” ideas. Referring also to scholars of race and gender, Ms. Vidal accused them of “always looking at everything through the prism of their will to divide, to fracture, to pinpoint the enemy.”
Ms. Vidal cited the “anti-separatism” law in France, which restricts religious freedom, overriding the 1905 secularism law. The law focuses on the right to association, as all associations are kept under constant threat of dissolution for their members’ actions. The new bill’s sponsor, Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin, said the aim is to stop “an Islamist hostile takeover targeting Muslims,” and he has stressed that “we are not fighting against a religion.”
In an interview defending the bill, Prime Minister Jean Castex made reference to a high school student “reciting [Quranic] verses while closing their ears in music class,” as the archetypal enemy that the French Republic is facing.
The bill contains 51 provisions such as ensuring that public service employees respect neutrality and secularism while protecting them against threats or violence. For example, Article 9 of the charter states that the “denunciation of alleged State racism” will be considered an act of “defamation.” In an act of victim-blaming, the document even says that speaking about state racism “exacerbates both anti-Muslim hatred and anti-France hatred.” It also seeks to ban mosques from engaging in “political speeches about foreign conflicts.”
One of the main methods that the French government will ensure that people comply with the law will be through incentives and fines. For example, any French citizen who receives state funds will need to sign a “contract of Republican commitment” ensuring they honor French values and this money must be paid back if the contract is broken.
Meaning, there will be no more free money and food from the country that these French dissidents condemn as they seek free handouts and government assistance from the very government, people, and traditions that these thankless people then attack after they enjoy the free food and shelter.
As expected, news of the investigation into Leftist extremism and the new law has faced serious backlash from Frances leading liberal establishment that sees this as a threat to their free speech and livelihoods built upon teaching and living upon these neoliberal ideas and terroristic ideals.
The President of Sorbonne University, Jean Chambaz compared the search for ideas of “Islamo-leftism” to the campaign by the Nazis and Action Française against communism and the Jews in the 20th century. According to TRT World, “Dr. Farid Hafez, an Austrian political scientist at the Department of Political Science and Sociology at the University of Salzburg, says French policies towards Muslims is an attempt at “domestication.”
“The French Charter of Imams signals to Muslims that they have to fully assimilate and have no right to be free human beings with dignity,” Hafez said to TRT World.
What neoliberals are calling a Nazi campaign to silence them is actually being implemented by many European governments around the world who are cracking down on the political radicalization and the corruption of the youth in their respective countries.
For example, Social Democrats have thrown Spanish rapper Pablo Hasél into prison for denouncing the monarchy, and in the United Kingdom, a new “freedom of speech” commission said it would impose financial penalties on universities that allow protests against academics tied to the government.
Will laws like this be coming to the United States of America who is also a strong ally of the French government?
I believe the recent political infighting, corruption, and Capital riots are a big clue that a law like this will be coming down the pike for neoliberal Americans who are the originators of this extreme brand of Leftism. Unscientific and nontraditional ideas that these teachers and media pundits are pushing have infected every nook and cranny of our culture as it unduly influences and corrupts our children.
I pray to God, my ancestors, and any God-fearing and loving Masons to stand with France against these neoliberals and their rotting Leftist ideas as they spit upon our traditions, religions, laws, and lives, which they seek to destroy one good soul at a time.
Moe is the founder of GnosticWarrior.com. He is a father, husband, author, martial arts black belt, and an expert in Gnosticism, the occult, and esotericism.
